FAITH & ATHEISM
Islam is such a great religion (as Obama says), then WHY IS IT SO
CHRISTOPHOBIC that Islamic countries find it necessary to ban the
Bible, making it a crime to possess one punishable by death. A
religion of truth and faith and without fear will not find it
necessary to ban the competition. There is no difference between
such a mentality and nazism . Until possessing a Bible is not a
crime, there is no reason to believe that Islam is a credible
religion. The issue is one of freedom of speech, which we seem to
be so willing to sacrifice so we don't offend anyone else's wrong
TWO FACES OF GOD
is called a "religion". But based upon what?
history tells us that the original Arabs were the sons of
as were the Jewish Hebrews, and that Abraham worshiped
The GOD that Abraham worshiped is the same GOD that was
by the the Jews before Christ, the same GOD that was
worshiped by Christ,
and the same GOD that is worshiped today
by Christians and Jews.
And his character is very clear. He is
a loving, benevolent, and forgiving GOD.
question is what happened to this GOD with respect to the
Was He not originally the same GOD?
Yet today, the
muslims see GOD as an angry, revengeful, dominating,
mongering God. Is this really the same God?
Or have the muslims
hi-jacked God and transformed him into something
he really is
not? How do we account for muslims calling GOD by the name
which means THE DIETY? This is very impersonal when
contrasted to the GOD
of the Christian. It is a totally
different face with a totally different name.
this really to be regarded as the same GOD?
Historical archaeological findings reveal that before he
was called ALLAH,
his real name was SIN, the MOON GOD. It is
from this moon god that the
name of the SINAI is
these findings, it seems clear that the
GOD of those original
Arabs has been replaced by the moon god, Sin.
Thus, we have the
two different faces of GOD, one of whom must be
those of you who do not believe that God exists, we can understand
your viewpoint. But what we do not accept is your very narrow
mindedness & insistence that all believe as you, even to the
extent of filing ridiculous court cases. Of what are you afraid?
Are you not Christophobic. You cannot deny that Christ
existed and that His God is more just and loving than Allah. And
if you do not accept Christ, then we know who your God must be and
that is our out-of- control court system. No matter, you
cannot legitimately keep the character of GOD out of our
government. Our military has a right to be buried with the cross
of Christ. We have the right to pray whenever or wherever, as
long as it is non-obstructive and respectful. We have a right
to adopt moral principle that is based upon Love and Justice.
can you call yourself a "humanist" and not believe in
Christ who was real, did in fact live, and was the greatest
"humanist" of all? And how can you call yourself a
"Christian" if you do not adhere to the teachings of
Christ? It is hypocrisy. No matter, you are free to choose as you
wish, because He has given you a free will. So you decide if you
live in hell or live in love. And if you decide to live in hell,
then don't impose your ridiculous baggage on everyone else via law
making or policy decisions or ridiculous law suits. The true
“humanist” freely believes in & follows the
teachings of Christ, recognizing & accepting the sacrifices &
compassion involved, without abandoning the obligations/duties of
protection owed to family, friends & fellow countrymen &
without rewarding bad selfish unthoughtful inconsiderate unjust
behavior. If such negative bad behavior does occur at the expense
of others, then the meting out of unkindness must be done
proportionate to the wrongfulness of the acts committed. Jesus
Himself imposed limits upon forgiveness & compassion.
is just one phrase coming out of the mouths of atheists - "I
don't believe". To be more accurate, it is "I CHOOSE not
to believe", and in so doing, the mindset becomes CLOSED. And
that is very dangerous,especially if they become politicians or
jurists. There is nothing wrong with questioning and having
doubts. You can even be angry with God, but not the Holy Spirit.
Intelligent and opened minds should have questions. That is part
of our "DISCRIMINATING" nature. We need to have
justifications and reasons for our thinking and behavior. It is in
accordance with the logic of cause and effect, albeit it may be
carried a bit too far in some cases resulting in the blame game.
But the minute we CHOOSE to eliminate the possibility of another
existence which we can neither prove nor disprove, we have closed
the possibilities for our own destinies.
is no justification for our imposing our own closed minds upon
others. We become merely a bunch of cry-babies wallowing in our
sorrows in accordance with "Misery loves company". So go
ahead and express your own doubts. You will be listened to. But
don't ruin the lives of others in forcing your disbeliefs upon
others. You might choose to justify your disbelief by pointing out
the hypocrisies of the churches, ie, priests molesting children,
anti-abortionist murdering doctors,etc..And you may have some
valid points. There is the good and the bad everywhere. But as
Christ said, you better be sure that you are on a higher moral
ground before condemning others. And you better be on the very
highest moral ground before you choose not to believe in God.
you get tired of hearing the "preaching". Who doesn't?
Okay, then go take a nap. And you don't have to wave your arms in
the air at holy rollers or get all weird. You don't even have to
sing or go to church. That is your choice. It is what is in your
heart that counts. And if what is in your heart is to squelch the
peaceful expressions of others, then you seek to take away their
freedom of speech, and that is just plain wrong. But if they are
blocking traffic causing a denial of public access, if they are
hiding something harmful to others & refusing a legitimate
search, if they are sneaking into your country to effectively
steal, etc,, then you have a legitimate complaint and should take
it to court. But don't waste your time and everybody else's with
stupid things like removing a cross from a hill, or taking a sign
down, or eliminating prayer at public meetings, or eliminating
teaching about Christ from school text books, etc. It is just
plain nonsense & is CHRISTOPHOBIC.
A RELIGION THAT DEMANDS EVERYONE CONFORM TO ITS DOGMA IS AN INSANE
MENTALITY MORE INSIDEOUS THAN NAZISM. This website strongly
advocates OUTLAWING SHARIA, finding it offensive to justice
& human rights.
Muslims on death row demand their meals be Islamic. Forget it
The execution of one who speaks against the unjust dogma of a
religion is unjustifiable homicide,
of capital punishment.
3. The stoning to death of an
adulteress is unjustifiable homicide, deserving of capital
4. The murder of pro-abortionist without their
consent is unjustifiable homicide, deserving of capital
5. The murder of a homosexual without their
consent is unjustifiable homicide, deserving of capital
6. The murder of anyone without their consent
is unjustifiable homicide, deserving of capital punishment.
RELIGIOUS RIGHTS VS COMMON SENSE.
Government's role should
be restricted as much as possible to public behavior.
has no right to meddle in one's personal affairs, except where
there is a violation of public law.
The role of religion is to
enter one's personal life, but only upon invitation.
of public law based upon claims of religious rights is
When it comes to religion, we are at a
crossroads as to the interaction between religion and
especially when it comes to dealing with the
so-called muslim faith and the conflicts that it presents
our society. The solution to our dilemma might be found if we
treat religion as we would secular education and our educational
If we compare the Koran (or Quran) to our
own Bible, we find that the Koran is a near parallel to the
chapters being less than 1/2 page.
Bible was written by several people over several centuries. The
Koran was written by just one person in a very limited time
OTHER WORDS, THE KORAN (HAVING BEEN WRITTEN BY ONE
LESS THAN THE EQUIVALENT OF A 1ST GRADE TEXT BOOK, IF THAT
consider this..... We do not let 1st graders graduate to 2nd
grade until they are prepared.
And so it should be with muslim believers. The muslim 1st grade
classroom is the middle east.
So let it be. BUT IN NO WAY SHOULD THEY BE ALLOWED INTO THE HIGHER
CLASSROOMS OF THE WORLD UNTIL THEY ARE READY TO GRADUATE..