You will know evil when there is disparate process & punishment for two different parties accused of the same crime.
It is a very short distance from voluntary “conformity” to forced “compliance”.
Diversity in journalism is most desirable. But fabrication of stories, dismissal of facts, and outright lying is not.
can leave us confused with terminology if we are not careful. Binary thinking can be myopic and lead to the wrong actions.
Just as there are the 3 contrasting spacial directions of left vs right, up vs down, & forward vs backward, there are contrasting terms to describe political position. So here is a list that is far more than 3 dimensional.
communism vs capitalism
(gov vs
private ownership)
socialism vs individualism
(conformity vs
independence)
fascism vs libertarianism
(restrictive vs
permissive)
liberal vs consevative
(disregard vs
careful thought)
tyranny vs democracy
(one vs
two party rule)
globalism vs nationalism
left vs right
(an aggregate
of the above)
So which would you rather be
FAR LEFT or FAR RIGHT?
(See the movie I DELORES on TUBI)
To be a “Democrat” means you believe in citizen election systems. It is derived from the Greek word, “democracy”. Democrats tend not to believe in a “republican” form of government. To be a “Republican” means you believe in a representative form of government. However, in a “republic” representatives can be appointed or elected. So it is critical to qualify what type of “Republican” one is. Current qualifiers include “left/liberal”, “centrist/moderate”, and “right/conservative”. And these same qualifiers apply to Democrats. However, this somewhat binary description can be misleading if we do not know the difference between “left” and “right”. So it is important to drill down as to the exact meaning, which is the reason for the preceding contrast of terms.
It really matters not whether one is a democrat or republican. What does matter is the specific type of democrat or republican one is. And this is where “socialism” comes in. Socialism stands in contrast to individualism, which means collective conforming demands as opposed to individual independency. The danger exists of demands for conformity turning into demands for compliance, which can turn into tyranny. Socialism can and does often become the pathway the injustice “fascism” or “communism”, and hence, tyranny.
A key question to ask ourselves is: Under what circumstances is independence vs unity justified? Commonality is definitely a factor in support of unity. But geographical distance, language and cultural differences are factors supporting independence.
Certainly, a one world government is far from desirable. But neither is a chaotic unruly free for all world.
Moderation in all aspects of life is the best optimization in governing life.
Before the current democrats came along, we had that. But now Biden is crushing it.
More than likely, the Biden admin sees today’s US nationalists as the equivalent of the violent Irish Republican Army. This is what we call “STEREO TYPING”. And it is completely wrong.
Irish Nationalists want(ed) complete separation and independence from England. US nationalists don’t want separation, BUT MERELY WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO DO ITS JOB PROTECTING THE BORDERS. So the Biden admin has done an immense disservice to US nationalists.
This little history of Irish Republicanism may be where we are in the US.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_republicanism
Further reading of political history reveals that “radicalism” is unique to the left as opposed to “social conservatism”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_radicalism
Today’s Biden admin has all the ear marks of radicalism.
Until seeing the documentary I DELORES, it had always bothered me that the IRA called themselves “Republican”. But that movie showed they considered themselves “SOCIALIST” Republicans as opposed to “TRADITIONAL” Republicans who they hated.
So once again we have socialists waging war and violence. Nothing new.
In 1921 Britain gave independence to Ireland. But six Northern counties wanted to remain in in the UK. This was not good enough for the. greedy IRA. So they began a war of crime and violence, just like all “socialists”.
Socialists call themselves “republican”. But that is a lie, because they only represent themselves. Socialists call themselves “democratic”. But that is a lie, because they do not honor a two party system. Socialists claim to support human rights. But that is a lie, because they cancel freedom of speech and imprison political adversaries.
Socialist politicians exploit minority malcontent to cause violence for the purpose of attaining power over police and military to use in over throwing our form of government. Their ruse has nothing to do with “human rights”. CS LEWIS.
“You might think that your love for humanity is sufficient to justify any other action. BUT THE MINUTE YOU MAKE ONE CAUSE YOUR ENTIRE PURPOSE, YOU FIND YOURSELF FALSIFYING EVIDENCE AND BECOMING A TREACHEROUS PERSON.”
One word… JUSTICE.
Before Obama was elected in 2008, the border crisis was already under way, with California already in the control of left wing nut jobs calling everyone opposed to opened borders a “racist”. And then, Jamiel Shaw, a young black kid just out of high school with a promising football career was shot and murdered by an illegal right in front of his home, while his mother was serving in Iraq. We watched the pain and suffering of this family as they sought justice from the so called “virtuous” democrats in LA who denied this family from being heard and comforted in their loss, thereby exposing once and for all the Democrats absolute lies and hypocrisy.
When Donald Trump was running for POTUS in 2016, his first thing was to give air to Mr Shaw, Jamiel’s father.
Donald Trump is the REAL THING. If you truly want truth and justice, then put him back in charge.
Having spent years trying out solar generated electricity, I would say IT WILL NEVER COME CLOSE TO REPLACING FOSSIL FUEL. And even the addition of wind generated electricity will not help. That is not to say that each has not its place.
Here is a good comparison of space station solar panel size to occupant capacity.
Max occupants = 7
8 panels each = 112 x 39 ft
That is almost 5000 sq ft per person.
How would you like a house of 5000 sq ft for just one person?
So how much does a wind turbine really produce?
Average wind speed is about 6.5 m/s, giving an average power output of 900W (from power curve). Average energy per day is 900W x 24h = 21,600 Wh or 21.6 kWh.
In my 800 sq ft home, I can use up to 600 KW-HRS in 30 days, or 20 KW-HRS per day.
Therefore, one wind turbine would barely power my house, despite the turbine having the ability to generate more power.
Looks like we need more global warming to produce stronger wind.
Maybe Pelosi, Kerry, Biden, et al should be giving their speeches in front of a wind turbine.
THE ONLY REAL GOOD SOURCE IS NUCLEAR.
A PLAN FOR REESTABLISHING POLITICAL EQUILIBRIUM.
Nothing is more dangerous than one political party being in control of everything as is the situation today. In the past we have had a relatively balanced government where neither party had total control of all branches of power. But the last election upset that balance making it possible for the current insanity to reign. So what can we do as citizens to correct the current situation.
First we need to vote entirely Republican in the next two elections. Next, once we have established a balance between political parties, every voter should split his votes between parties.
But this alone is not enough. The bureaucrats have party loyalties that can & have adversely impacted fair elections. The Democrats have no problem endorsing affirmative action based upon skin color. SO WHY NOT HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BASED UPON POLITICAL LOYALTY WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT THAT ASSURES A 50-50 SPLIT POLITICALLY IN THE BUREAUCRACY.
If we are ever to secure our form of government for future generations, this must be done. You know this is the truth.
A PLAN FOR SECURE VOTING
x
Here is the REAL FASCISM threatening democracy. The simple answer is to BAN SHARIA. But just like Stalin did at the beginning of WWII, communist Democrats have joined with Muslim fascists to bring down our country. Biden is attempting to obscure that fact.
PI is aid to be the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its radius. PI is an irrational number, meaning it cannot be represented as a fraction of two whole numbers. But it is impossible to travel or measure an irrational distance, which leads to questioning whether a circle is a reality or not.
But there is another way of defining a circle provided by the pythagorean theorem, r** = x** + y**. This produces a locus of points said to be all all equidistant from the center. However, there is a caveat, ie, r is an irrational distance. ` So how do we know that all points are equidistant from the center?
The key question in the abortion issue is “When does life begin?”. Given that most natural miscarriages occur within the first 3 months, it might stand to reason that life begins after 3 months. What might that mean? It might be construed to mean that the 3+ month old baby has the right of consent. That being the case, it would legally be murder for anyone to terminate the babys life without its consent. And that is where the state should come in.
Clearly, there is a difference between the legal definition of life (wherein the state has a duty to step in) and the religious definition of life (wherein the parents have a moral obligation to nurture).
So the question becomes, WHY CANT THESE STUPID PEOPLE MAKE A DECISION TO ABORT OR NOT WITHIN 3 MONTHS. THERE IS SIMPLY NO EXCUSE.
Memorial day is a day to remember not only our fallen military, but all innocent victims fallen at the hands of senseless violence.
We should remember that:
Lying is not sustainable.
Harrassment is not protesting. It is criminal.
There is no such thing as a country without borders.
Autonomous Nationalism is not imperialistic communism/fascism.
Democracy requires nationhood.
Unjustifiable homicide is the delibetate taking of another persons life without explicit or implicit consent.
Without justifiable capital punishment, gun control is folly.
Due Process is not keeping people imprisoned indefinitely without the justification of a speedy trial.
Turning a blind eye to violence is systemic sponsership of unjustifiable homicide by fake media and politicians .
Minor children should not be exposed to the purient intetests of adults or the indoctrination to untruth.
Legitimate Freedom does not impose upon the legitimate freedom of others.
The refusal to look at evidence is one of the most dangerous
ploys that underminds justice and democracy, leading to corruption and tyranny. Nothing can be self evident when all of the cards are not on the table.
.
May our innocent fallen rest in peace safe from the abyss of further evil.
Why can’t you understand George Soros? It’s because he has no boundaries in his thinking. Everything is “opened” , therefore nothing is definable. As a matter of fact, he admits that his opened society is more important than nationalism and democracy. So he has become a meddling old fool and an enemy of democracy and nationalism. And because he speaks in very vague terms and has made a lot of money, he appears to be super intelligent. Bottom line is that he is a survivalist at the expense of others & one step above committing the criminal acts he pays others to do.
His entire thinking is based upon counter-intuitivism which got him rich in the first place. What does that mean? Everyone now knows that when an airplane’s wings stop flying, intuition says to pull back on the stick, which is wrong. To correct a stall, it is necessary to do the opposite of intuition, ie push forward on the stick. That’s counter-intuitivism. And it worked for Soros in making money. BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT WORKS IN ALL SITUATIONS.
What Soros calls his “philantropy” is actually “political activism”, sometimes good, but more recently bad . Soros was instrumental in the downfall of So Africa’s Apartide government, which was a situation where the white minority was ruling over the black majority. But he has since obviously reversed his views on the majority ruling over the minority when it comes to the United States, opting to base his entitre thinking upon skin color, sexual orientation, etc. We can well expect that the teaching of Critical Race Theory in our schools has been funded by George Soros, in addition to his other follies.
So why has Soros funded DAs that refuse to prosecute? IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS THAT SOROS IS VIOLATING POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION LAWS. Therefore, his funding of DAs is PREPAID BRIBERY.
To diverge, let me say a word about “counter intuitivism”. Counter intuitivism (counter-intuition) may work in some situations, but to apply it across the board can have some disasterous results. I think we all consider doing something counter-intuitive at one time or another, especially when we are searching for answers or are boxed in. Nevertheless, we better be sure that results of doing sonething counter intuitive is not going to be worse than if we had done nothing at all.
Our fore fathers admonished us to recognize the “self evident”, ie the obvious. In the movie Star Wars the similar phrase was “trust your feelings”. I would prefer “trust your senses” and history.
But in war time, counte- intuitivism may work, because it surprises the enemy. And of course that is assuming you intend to justifiably kill the enemy. Just be prepared to live with the results, ie your own good conscience. Even Nazi soldiers having executed jews admited they were plagued by their own conscience afterwards.
To diverge a bit further, a word about “hatred”. Nothing is worse than the hater of hatred. Hatred does not necessarily mean violence. This is not to say that “hate crimes” dont exist. A crime is a crime whether based upon hatred or not. To emphasize one particular type of crime above another similar type has the ear-markings of political malfeasance. So a murder based upon hatred should be dealt with no differently than a murder based upon other circumstances.
The intelligent person will note that there is justifiable hatred and unjustifiable hatred. Hatred based upon skin color is indeed unjustifiable & wrong, because it is indiscriminate And hatred of hate is also indiscriminately unjustifiable & wrong, because it does not consider all of the justifications & facts .
A “hate mongerer” is one who promotes unjustifiable hatred by attempting to instill the unjustfied hatred in others. The motivation is not based upon any real social justice, but instead is intended to strengthen the hate mongerer’s position. We have examples of this in today’s Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and the Democratic Party all of which use mass intimidation in one form or another and which George Soros so generously supports.
And now a word about “nationalism”. Too many people ignorantly equate this word with the German Nazi “NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMAN WORKERS PARTY” and construe it with “imperialism”. They could not be any more undiscerning & wrong.
“Nationalism” is a way of dividing the world up into more manageable entities and implimenting democracy. It stands opposed to a globalist free flow chaotic world, unless of course there is some global dictator which is imperialistic in & by itself. In addition, nationalism permits like-minded people to unite together without dictating to people of another mind-set. Nationalism is more compartmentalized divetsity in thinking & mores which is overall more beneficial to the human species. So once again, the thinking of George Soros is quite defective & leading to exactly what every rational person fears, ie a global imperialistic dictatorship.
One of the biggest ploys in politics is to construe a question as being and order. More recently Mark Espers, who was briefly Secretary Of Defense in 2020, has come out with a book charging that Trump is unfit based upon Trump asking him if missles could not be used against the drug cartels, a perfectly legitimate question. Espers, as a cabinet member , was asked for his advice & was not being given an order.
And in another meeting with Trump during the violence ensueing immediately after the George Floyd death, Espers says that Trump was seeking to deploy military troops to quell the violence. So he, Espers, took it upon himself to empty armories of guns in case Trump gave the order to activate the troops. That would be premature obstruction of what could have been a direct order given by the President amounting to mutiny. Oh, but he claims Trump asked if he could not shoot the violent protestors, which is again a question, not an order. Certainly Trump would be more aware than Espers of the Kent State affair in the 1970s and the political implications.
So it would seem that Espers twice failed to use his brains, opting to jump to conclusions rather than exercising proper judgment.