More states join Texas in law suit against 4 renegade states in election fraud, now making 1/3 of the states adverse to the manner in which this election was conducted.. Negligence on the part of the Supreme Court in this matter is an invitation to civil war. This should be obvious to anyone.
Month: December 2020
(Correction: Payne was not an atheist. Atheistic liberals would paint him as one. However, he did reject the Bible while claiming to believe in one natural God. So it could be said that he was not a Christian, yet he still believed in a creator. So he was a creationist.)
Man’s intellect has always been at odds with Christian belief in the Bible. Every person struggles to reconcile what he see as fact verses fantasy. What is frequently overlooked is that it is out of our own imagination that fantasy becomes fact. This is one reason I find it objectionable to rule out Christianity simply because my brain says “It ain’t so”. To do so would be arrogance and potentially deceitful.
This does not mean that I accept anything and everything. Quite to the contrary, I am very particular about what I believe and most importantly, why.
Evidence is an important criteria for forming belief. To ignore obvious evidence is to stoop to stupidity. For example, one piece of evidence is the more recent find of highly compressed sulfur balls (aka, “brimstone”) around the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Are we going to ignore and/or discredit that evidence? On the other hand, we can exaggerate the significance of evidence which is equally flawed.
Observed patterns of behavior is another factor in forming belief. Belief leads to judgment and judgment can lead to acceptance or condemnation. This is what I would call the process of the intellect.
The two men spoken of herein were both of superior intellect, but differed on the subject of Christianity. And maybe that is what this is all about, ie, intelligent people going in different directions from each other with no reconciliation.
If you do not know who Thomas Payne was, let me mention the American Revolution of the 18th century. He is the guy who wrote COMMON SENSE. Later on, he made it quite clear that he thought the Bible to be trash and wrote The Age Of Reason.
Because Payne had close ties to the founding fathers, it is being said today by liberals that the founding fathers were not Christians. That argument simply does not hold water for several reasons. First, it posits the fallacious reasoning of guilt by association. Secondly, it fails to acknowledge that all Christians, including the founding fathers, find themselves in a constant state of flux with respect to their belief in the Almighty. Thirdly, it fails to acknowledge the very personal and private nature of Christianity. Fourth, it is absolutely no one’s right to declare another person as being this or that unless the individual himself declares his own identity. And finally, it appears to be a fallacious conspiracy theory designed to undermined the belief in our democracy.
As the old saying goes “Misery loves company”. “If I do not believe in it, then why should you believe in it?” is misery’s mantra. And so it seems to be so with these liberals today. I have very little faith in what the liberals say about our forefathers. It is not up to me to judge whether or not the founding fathers were Christian. But because I see in their work the humanity professed in the Bible, I can only conclude that they were in fact Christians.
The founding fathers came from a Protestant background. To understand the founding fathers’ beliefs, one has to understand the history of religious persecution visited upon protestants by the Roman Catholic Church. It is not that the founding fathers were not Christians. It is more that they accepted the teaching of Martin Luther who rebelled against and was persecuted by the Roman Catholic Church. Secrecy of belief became an essential for survival. Today, liberals like to make a big deal out of the secrecy claiming it to be some mystic conspiracy. Utter nonsense.
Now, let’s turn to C S Lewis who wrote Mere Christianity in the 1940s. Lewis was an atheist professor at Cambridge University. But he became a Christian and expounded on the Christian belief in the greatest of detail and with the greatest of logical reasoning, as required by Payne. In my mind , Lewis not only proved the existence of God, he went on to detail why Jesus Christ was/is God incarnate, thereby refuting Payne’s belief in a non-Christ God. Were Payne alive today, we might ask him “Who is this nebulous God that you believe in?”, to which his answer could only be “I do not know”. On the other hand, C S Lewis gives us a very clear answer, ie, “God is Jesus Christ” & “Jesus Christ is God”. Therefore, to deny that Jesus Christ is in fact God is to deny the existence of God.
Thomas Payne believed in reason to the exclusion of Jesus Christ as being God. That is somewhat different from atheists who believe in reason, yet deny God’s existence. Regardless of this slight difference, certainly people of intellect would believe in “good” reasoning. But if we do not know who God is and what his character is, then how do we know good reasoning from bad or faulty reasoning? This in itself seems to be “self evident”. And of course we already know the atheistic liberals’ answer as to the identity of God, ie, they are God. Do you not see their circular reasoning and their underlying motive to rule over others?
As an Interesting side note, I mention John Winthrop whose Christian faith enabled him and his followers to survive in the early colonies where others did not. I also mention John Adams as being the only crew member of the HMS BOUNTY surviving the violence that ensued on Pitcairn Island, his survival being thanks to his Bible. So you atheist liberals can lament all you want to discredit the validity of the Christian belief. But we have the historical proof. There being no honor among thieves, treachery abounds and kills itself. Yet Christianity survives.
Categories
NEW LA DA ENDORSES LAWLESSNESS
George Gascon, a George Soros supported attorney and a guy who has never really practiced law, has become the LA District Attorney and says he will virtually sanction criminals. He promises to do away with all bail, which would allow criminals to escape prosecution. WHY DO WE EVEN BOTHER TO HAVE LAWS? LIKE ALL SLEAZEBAG LIBERALS, HE WANTS THE POSITION WITHOUT DOING THE JOB.
Not yet. The contested election continues despite liberals cheers.
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/scotus/2020/12/08/id/1000615/
This action did not blow away the case. It only denied the injunctive relief sought. The case still goes on.
People are concerned about how long this can continue. The answer is “Right up to Jan 6, 2020”. Justice Ginzberg herself espoused this decision.
Meanwhile, Texas, joined by 8 other states, have just sued the 4 derelict states, Pa, Mn, Mi, & Ga, for conducting a fraudulent election. The court has ordered those 4 states to respond by Thursday.
I do not like the LA Mayor. But I sure would not protest at his home.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/lapd-batons-black-lives-matter-protesters-garcetti-home
Categories
DEFINITE ACT OF WAR
Categories
UP-SIDE-DOWN DISCIPLINE
UP-SIDE-DOWN DISCIPLINE is at the heart of our problems today. Which is harder, giving a good spanking to little Johnny who kicked his little sister in the shins or scolding Johnny’s younger brother not to use that foul word again ? Which is harder, fighting a bully or turning your back to pick on a retarded little girl? Which is harder, confronting a rioter who is busting store windows, or joining a crowd of by standers? Which is harder, stopping illegals from flooding across the border without consequences, or telling others they are “racists” for doing their duty to neighbors? Which is harder, throwing a person in jail who has committed a heinous crime, or busting a person who dissents with your edicts? Which is harder, executing well proven killers, or just taking care of them in prison the rest of their lives while you throw other people in the same jail for much lesser crimes if they are crimes at all?. THE DON QUIXOTE ATTACK UPON OTHERS FOR LESSER CRIMES WHILE TURNING A BLIND EYE TO MORE SERIOUS CRIME IS THE KIND OF SOCIETY THAT LIBERAL DEMOCRATS HAVE IMPOSED & WOULD CONTINUE TO IMPOSE UPON THIS COUNTRY. IT IS TIME TO STOP IT!
“WE CHOOSE TO GO TO THE MOON, NOT BECAUSE IT IS EASY, BUT BECAUSE IT IS THE HARDER THING TO DO” JFK
Categories
POLITICAL PAYOFFS BEGIN
Categories
WHERE ARE GOV NEWSOM’S BRAINS?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san-mateo-county-newsom-stay-at-home-order
https://www.facebook.com/RCSD.Official/videos/436879577475063
Newsom has ordered a stay-at-home edict that is neither enforceable nor an effective solution to the covid-19 pandemic. Furthermore, where most people recognize the need for masks and social distancing when in public, there is one little item that would be enforceable and directly attack the problem, one which Mr Bureaucrat has failed to implement & would make it easier on all concerned. That little item is to require all businesses, cafes, grocery stores, gas stations, etc, to provide clean hand wipes. Everything we touch with our hands in public is a source of infection, ie, the doors to businesses, the gas pumps, our credit cards, bank/business touch screens, etc. Except for those who judiciously clean their hands every time they touch something, how many people are able to clean their hands immediately after touching something? My bet is they are not in the position to until they get near a wash basin or home, at which time they probably forget. Of course, carrying a hand cleaner is very wise. But do you always have it with you. I bet not.
To shut down everything is not the answer. And, Mr Newsom, to tell people they cannot have any guests in their own homes is absolutely ludicrous, arrogant, ineffective and unconstitutional. Where in the hell do you get off with that? Of course you can call it an unlawful assembly. But then we did not see you invoke the unlawful assembly charges against those rioters and protesters who invaded our neighborhoods during the spring and summer. So it is perfectly clear, Mr Newsom, that you are nothing but one hypocritical jerk who, like Don Quixote, only attacks low hanging fruit & who should be run out of office, and preferably out of the state.
That ICUs cannot handle the covid-19 patient load is not the right criteria for shutting down businesses & an entire county. Your cure is far worse that the disease. How about you begin innovating to accommodate those over burdening crowds that you have created for the purposes of diluting the citizen electorate of this country via your ridiculous immigration policies? How about you actually use the hospital ships that were offered last spring? The fact of the matter is, you liberal democrats create more problems than you solve. And I would dare say that this country’s covid-19 epidemic is really your fault, just like everything else you have done to screw up this country.