Category: COMMON SENSE

The left has a history of failed protective services. If you recall, during the attack on Bengazi , the military was told to stand down, resulting in the death of the ambassador. During the withdrawal from Afghanistan, they military was more than likely told to stand down. And it is obvious they have failed to protect the borders. This leads me to believe that the secret service was told to stand down in taking out Trump’s would be assassin. Yet the left has no trouble using undue deadly force in raiding Trump supporters homes.

Where at first it may seem that such failing is simply due to stupidity, it is becoming more and more evident, especially considering the defunding  of the police, that it is by deliberate design and completely contrary to the purpose of any government, ie, to protect the well being of its citizens.

WHY DID THE BIDEN ADMIN AUTHORIZED THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE BY THE FBI WHEN THE SECRET SERVICE WAS IN CHARGE OF TRUMPS MARALAGO. Merrick Garland said it was “standard operating procedure” WHEN COMMON SENSE AND LAW SAYS THAT A GOVERNMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY MUST SHED ITS WEAPONS WHEN ON THE GROUNDS OF A LOCATION UNDER CONTROL OF A SYBLING LAW AGENCY FOR THE PURPOSES OF AVOIDING ARMED CONFLICT BETWEEN TWO AGENCIES OF THE SAME GOVERNMENT. This is only common sense. So one must ask WHAT POSSIBLE REASON COULD THERE BE FOR THE BIDEN ADMIN TO AUTHORIZE DEADLY FORCE KNOWING THAT THE SECRET SERVICE WAS IN CHARGE OF MARALAGO?

This concept is introduced based upon the belief that there can be no confidence in an electronic election count system until each an every state provide what would be called the virtual precinct that provides an after-the-fact ability for the voter to validate his own counted ballot, in addition to providing a method for auditing the vote count within the voter’s precinct. So how would such a system work? First, we need to identify the two big concerns to the average voter.

Concern #1 is identifying exactly who is eligible to vote and what is the total count of eligible voters at the time of an election. Certainly a county government is able to identify its eligible voters by referring to a county’s property tax roles. But this only covers property owners. What about renters? It makes sense for a state government to obtain this information by referring to its DMV driver’s licenses, assuming there are no non-citizens allowed a drivers license. But what about those who do not own property or own a car, ie, the homeless, who may be citizens?

So we see there remains a problem in identifying all those who should be eligible to vote in any given election. One solution has been offered called VOTER ID. However, it does not solve the problem of ballots being issued to dead voters. To solve this problem, I suggest that to be eligible to vote in a general election, an eligible voter must have voted in the primary election within the same year of the general election. In this manner, one can be reasonably assured of an accurate total electorate count within a state. Of course, there may be deaths and resident transitions within the few months between the primary and general elections. But why should a state allow any new residents to vote immediately when they can vote in any subsequent elections. In implementing such requirements, one can expect that the count from the primary will not be any greater in the general election.

Concern #2 is what can only be called the opaque electronic count system. It is not sufficient for a vote count to not be publicly audited. Transparency is an absolute necessity to provide trust in the results. This can only be done by the state providing to the voter a virtual precinct.

My electric bill for January is $180 for 655 KWH.
It has been a cold cold month. I have one computer on at all times with two electric utility heaters that kick in and out depending on thermostat settings. Plus, I have two air filtration devices of which I run only one for no more than 8 hours a day. My water heater is all electric. I never use stove or oven. I only use a microwave very minimally. No dishwasher or wash machine. One refrig.

Without changing habits, summer usage is like half. So I have to figure the water heater and two heaters account for the difference, ie, 300 KWH.

I’m sorry Biden, BUT I AIN’T GOING TO FREEZE MY ASS OFF FOR YOU AND YOUR DUMB POLICIES. NOR DO I EXPECT ANYONE TO FREEZE THEIR ASS OFF FOR ME.

As far is Biden is concerned, we can all eat bugs, ride electric bicycles and huddle together to prevent hypothermia. Meanwhile,  he will enrich our lives with drag queen story hour. And if you object, he will have you thrown in jail for a lifetime.

Why Is It Important To Restrict Access To This Country?

Three Words:
Portable Nuclear Bombs

Over the years we have witness an increase in a mentality that is willing to blow itself up along with its preceived adversaries in an act of alleged justice. This makes it imperative that access to dangerous technology be highly guarded from falling into the wrong hands. This is the real problem facing humanity today. And we must not forget that fact.

Joe Biden appears to have forgotten that by allowing anybody and everybody into this country without proper vetting. In so doing, he has increased the probability of some nutjob acquiring access to dangerous technology.

Then there are those who say “Well, nuclear bomb technology has become so proliferated that it makes no difference what we do. So we might as well give up and let the nutjobs have their way.” WRONG. As long as there is one ounce of rationality left in the world, that glimmer of hope needs to be maintained.

One thing is for certain. To make “global warming” the central theme in global politics rather than protecting the world from nuclear proliferation is completely irresponsible. And what does DEI have to do with protecting the world? NOT ONE DAMN THING. DEI = Divisive Efforts and Injustice. It is interesting to note that DEI spelled backwards is IED, Improvised Explosive Device.

The RIGHT STRATEGY to defend against nuclear attacks from the air is Reagan’s STRATEGIC DEFENSE INITIATIVE. But to protect against nulear IED attacks, the border must be highly restricted with RBA, not open borders. And you cant have either protections if you persist in pursuing green energy, electric cars, and DEI to the exclusion of all else.