Categories
BREAKING THE CONSTITUTION CALL FOR ACTION COMMON SENSE CONSPIRACY, DEEP STATE CORRUPTION ECONOMY HISTORY HYPOCRISY INJUSTICE NEGLIGENCE, DERELICTION OF DUTY SOLUTIONS STUPIDITY THE TRUTH

THE BIGGEST REAL THREAT TO OUR DEMOCRACY


A. FACTS:

  1. ARTICLE 14 of the US CONSTITUTION:
    . SECTION 1 defines a “citizen” as one born here or naturalized.
    . SECTION 2 defines “state apportionment” as being based upon
    . . . . . . . . . . . the “numbers” of people in the state, excluding
    . . . . . . . . . . . “indians”. From this we can infer that only citizens
    . . . . . . . . . . . be counted in determining each state’s
    . . . . . . . . . . . representative count.
    Several Amendments after Amendment 14 make it
    clear that only “citizens” may vote.

2. ELECTORAL & CONGRESSIONAL APPORTIONMENT:

Each state automatically gets 2 electoral votes for its 2 senators plus its representative apportionment based on its percentage of the total population. This means there are 100 total electoral votes over and above the electoral votes based upon population, which makes it possible for a candidate to win the electoral votes while getting less than the popular vote.

Why is this so? The original Constitution was ratified by the states, each state being counted as a person. This continues to be recognized & serves as a protection for the lesser populated states from being dominated by the more populated states. Its only fair. Besides that, the states are the ones who can vote to amend or end the Constitution, since they are they original grantors.

As previously mentioned, each state should get additional electoral votes based upon its percentage of the total citizen population. And the number of representatives allotted to each state should equal its electoral vote. So the whole voting system is proportional and fair.

Yet democrats are constantly heard complaining about the electoral college claiming it to be a “Threat to their democracy”. This is pure nonsense. They are GREEDY IDIOTS. Their idea of “democracy” is a primitive one that would utterly destroy the idea of a united states. If you are going to play identity politics correctly, then you better differentiate between citizens and non citizens and protect state sovereignty. Otherwise you don’t have a nation, you have a cesspool.

Citizens have a duty to protect each other from wrong, regardless of race, sex, color or creed. CITIZENSHIP IS THE ONLY THING THAT BRINGS US TOGETHER AS A NATION, NOT HUMANITY. Humanity will never bring the world together, because it is always mistreated one way or another. The humanity of today boils down to robbing from one to give to another. It is contrary to free voluntary gifting.

No matter, to democrats who are trying to dumb down US citizens by saying “Democracy is for all people where ever they are and regardless of citizenship”. So yes, citizenship is a threat to “their” primitive democracy. Why do you think the Biden DOJ/FBI seem to be harassing only US citizens and not illegals?

3. HISTORY OF US CENSUS SINCE 1950:

The last time the US census counted the number of US citizens was 1950 at which time there were 151 MILLION citizens of which 31% were children or roughly 51 MILLION children. In 1952, there were 66 MILLION voting citizens. Since 1950 the government appears to obfuscate the census counts, failing to differentiate between citizen and non-citizen populations, thereby distorting each states apportionment of House representative & elector count.

From 1960 onward. we have the following;
1960: 179 MILLION
1970: 203 MILLION
1980: 227 MILLION
1990: 249 MILLION
2000: 281 MILLION
2010: 308 MILLION

IT IS CLEAR THAT THE NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR EACH SANCTUARY STATE IS BASED, NOT UPON THE COUNT OF CITIZENS AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTITUTION, BUT A COUNT OF ALL RESIDENTS, NON CITIZEN AND CITIZEN ALIKE. AS A RESULT EACH STATES NUMBER OF ELECTORS & HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IS ALSO OVER STATED.

In order to determine the number of real citizens as distinct form the number of non-citizens without a distinct number being provided, the only way to approximate the number is via reverse computing. Given a) the total number of presumed citizen voters in a national election, b) the voter turnout, c) the total population, & d) the percentage that are children, it is possible to estimate the total number of citizens, x = a/b- 1/2(c*d) . But this is only a rough estimate & depends upon correctness of the numbers given by the government.

So, for the 2020 election we have:

Voted for Biden in 2020: 81 MILLION
Voted for Trump in 2020: 74 MILLION
a) Total number of adult citizen Votes: 155 MILLION

b) Voter turnout in 20202: 66.8%

Total number of adult citizen(?) voters:
155 / .668 = 232 MILLION ADULT CITIZENS

In 2020 the total 2020 population was:
c) & d) 331 MILLION of which 73 MILLION were minors.
Half of children estimated to be citizens: 36 MILLION

Total number of citizens including children in 2020:
232 + 36 = 268 MILLION CITIZENS

Total number of non citizens in 2020:
331 – 268 = 63 MILLION NON-CITIZENS

4. THE NATIONAL DEBT

The national DEFICIT is the current year amount spent minus the current year taxes collected. If more money is taken in than spent it is a SURPLUS. The national DEBT is the accumulation on national deficits over the years. It can only be relieved by surpluses.

The national debt:

In 2000, it was $5.5 Trillion

GWB increased it by $4.4 Trillion to
$10 Trillion

Obama increased it by another $9.5 Trillion to $19.5 Trillion.

Trump increased it by another $8 Trillion to $27.5 Trillion

and Biden will increase it by at least
$10 Trillion to $ 37.5 Trillion.

Trump is the only one showing a diminished increase. He was not in for two terms. But neither will Biden be in two terms.

B. DEMOCRATS DESTRUCTION OF RATIONAL LIVING & ELECTIONS:

Illegal non-citizens are the perfect paradigm for the democrat global warming issue. After all, they walked here and did not drive. Do democrats really believe they are going to continue walking once they get here? Do democrats really believe that illegals are going to continue voting for them once illegals settle in?

What the democrats have done is to take the
BIGGEST POLITICAL GAMBIT IN HISTORY PUTTING IN JEOPARDY THE LARGEST GROUP OF PEACE LOVING CITIZENS EVER IMAGINED.

Democrats are deliberately destroying our democracy by exacerbating election difficulties via allowing untold numbers of foreigners to trespass into our country. Probably one of the greatest difficulties in conducting an election is knowing who is eligible to vote and who is not.

Counties are are suppose to be the first resource to determine this, because they are the central hub for identifying property tax payers. But the property tax rolls only identify property owners, not renters or homeless people or resident non-citizens. Therefore, each county registrar is supposedly charged with the task of identifying citizen voters.

Instead, the states appear to have taken charge of that task. And in so doing have made the task more inaccurate by requiring the motor vehicle departments to register non-citizens for voting as if they are citizens. As a result, the US Constitution is being violated, not to mention the near impossibility of obtaining a drivers license.

It should now be clear to every US citizen that the Democratic Party has become a traitor to our democracy by obfuscating the election process and employing the inflow of illegal entrants in the hopes of maintaining power. They are not without help from some very stupid republicans, aka, RINOS. Those now working in government need to ask themselves how far they are willing to go for a worthless paycheck.

It is clear that democrats have not inspired trust in our election system by maintaining open borders. That fact, coupled with the wide flung use of electronic election systems leaves the US citizen with very little confidence that elections are not rigged. It can be said that no matter which party is in control of the election process, without the electorate being able to validate their own counted ballot and see the accumulation of actual ballots counted for a particular candidate after the fact, there can be no confidence in the electronic tabulated election results.

C. THE NATIONAL ELECTION SOLUTION:

Our current election system is a piece of crap. It is a hodgepodge of manual and batch systems ripe with fraud. That an online real time election system has not been made available by now is an absolute crime. So what would an online real time election system look like?

THE DATABASE:
We start with the actual database? What is a database, you ask?
It is a filing organization and access system.
Here is a diagram of what it would look like.

(Too small? On your phone, expand it. On your computer, right click and open image in new tab.)

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is ELECTN-DB8.png

So how does one read this diagram?

Each box represents a “record type” having a specific data content & format different from the other boxes that represent different “record types”. (Note: the word “record type” is used interchangeably with the word “record”). Boxes at the top are basic entity record types & accessible via their ids. Unconnected diagonal lines into some of these top boxes indicates they are directly accessible. As you can see, there are 4 basic entity record types: year, nation, state, & person.

Lines connecting top level boxes to lower level boxes are links from top level records to lower level record types, thus forming a chain of lower level records. The top level box is said to be the master record type of the lower level detail boxes. For each top level master record there can be any number of lower level detail records.

So for example, given a nation id of USA, one could directly access the USA record & then traverse the state chain to access all the states within the USA. Similarly, one could access all the counties within a state by traversing the county chain. And so on.

Although the default direction of traversal from master to detail records appears to be downward (or forward), upward (or backward) traversal from any detail to master can be possible before a person actually votes. However after vote occurs, traversal in either direction between a voter-ballot-link record and a voter-location-link record should be restricted to the voter for privacy reasons. Today’s average browser-to-website user should not find this method of navigation too difficult to understand.

PRE-ELECTION RECORD CREATION AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES:

Each state would have this database file system accessible to the public via their website on their own computer. The database would be initialized only one time with the geographic records of nation, state and counties, these being fixed entities. But before participating in an election, each state resident voter, including state & county employees, must already have or create their own reusable logon id record. Only state & county employee logons should be allowed to update the entire database for the purposes of setting up the database content.

VOTER REGISTRATION & JOINING AN ELECTION:

Of particular importance before each election is the validation and creation of the voter-ballot-link records for each logon record. This process establishes the voter rolls for each specific election. It begins with a person submitting a voter-id-ballot-request record to an authorized state employee who initiates a search of other states by checking each states registered-voter-year-check record. If no such record is found & everything else checks out on the person, the state employee creates a single year-voter check record, followed by setting up the voter-ballot-link records leaving blank the candidate-selection button in each voter-ballot-link record.

VOTING:

The database is now ready for the voter to make his candidate selections by clicking the appropriate candidate-selection button in each appropriate voter-ballot-link record, at which time a write-permission lock is placed on the voter-ballot-link record. This would prevent anyone from changing candidate-selection button and the corresponding link to the selected candidate record.

POST VOTING RECORD ACCESS:

For secrecy/privacy purposes all cast voter-ballot-link records should be locked from updating by anyone other than the voter and as soon as they are counted. With this one exception, all should be able to view any record at any time, thus providing complete transparency and veracity of an election. In other words, everyone can look anywhere but not touch.

THE NETWORK:
Each state would have the same file system within a website on their own computer. In addition to state residents being able to create and logons to the state website, each state computer would have access to other state computers to eliminate double dipping voters who might try to vote in more than one state. Currency of voter rolls is essential.

In addition, currency of vote tabulation is essential. As soon as a voter has locked his voter-ballot record, his vote should be counted and tallies by candidate should be made available. Washington DC should be connected to each state & have access to each state database for the purpose of rolling up ballot totals for each national candidate by state.

PROS:
What would be the advantages of an online real time election system?
First, the voter would cast his ballot directly into the database, thereby eliminating anybody other than the voter from touching his ballot.
Second, the election should be completed within 2 days.
Third. since there is only one machine per state involved, auditing software should be comparatively easy as well as identifying any other anomalies.

CONS:

There will always be some ding dong who insists on having a paper ballot which necessitates having a batch input system.

D. DEMOCRATS PROPENSITY FOR LAWLESSNESS & VIOLENCE:

ANTIFA & BLM are two violent groups that democrats seem to love. Where they certainly have a right to speak, they do not have a right to attack and loot businesses, setting them on fire. Contrary to the idiot reporter who can be quoted as saying “This is a peaceful protest”, NO IT WAS NOT. And contrary to the phony democratic party J6 committee claiming J6 was an “insurrection”, NO IT WAS NOT. On J6 there were at least two murders by Capitol Police of which democrats are proud. SHAME ON THEM!

To further their gas-lighting of the American citizen, they claim that “Domestic Terrorism” is on the rise while allowing in real terrorists. “Just look at all those lawless citizen vigilantes supporting Trump who is worse than Hitler”. Yata yata …. yata. How many times now have we heard the term “domestic terrorism” used by Biden’s corrupt DOJ coupled with the democrats slur, ‘Islamaphobia”. Such rhetoric only inflames a society that was evilly attacked by radical Islam on 911 & then told they were not a Christian nation by a deceitful president who used his power to persecute them further. If they had any intentions at all of promoting domestic tranquility, all they would have to do is to BAN SHARIA LAW which is not a religion. Sharia Law is a core part of Islamic ideology and stands completely incompatible with western values. 1948 India should have shown any intelligent person how dangerous Islam Sharia is to western democracy. I would dare say, if you wish to worship Allah instead of Christ, be my guest. But don’t try to push your bull poop laws down our throat.

E. MASTERS OF DECEIT.
The Democratic Party Ukrainian Playbook

Where fascism and communism have been traditionally seen as opposites, it would seem that the current Democratic Party, in conjunction with neo conservatives, has practiced a hybrid combination of these two opposites, sometimes appearing as communistic and other times appearing to be fascistic.
No matter their ideology, there is one most evident characteristic, ie, their desire to stay in power no matter the cost. And the Ukrainian coup of a duly elected president in 2014 is their playbook.

Here is the truth about the Ukraine.

https://androidmovie.com/movie/ukraine-on-fire/97895

Note that in 2011 the President of the Ukraine was democratically and legitimately elected. The events of 2013 and 2014 led to an unconstitutional overthrow of the government spawned by neo facists. Today we are very close in this country to repeating that unlawfulness and violence.

This fascist coup of a democratically elected president that took place in the Ukraine in 2014 is the model for todays Democratic Party strategy. When they are out of power or when their power position is threatened, they will stage violent demostrations to make it look like the opposition party is at fault. Just look at how they have staged the Jan 6 “insurrection” which was not an insurrectiion. Compare that to the George Floyd “peaceful” demonstrations that preceeded Jan 6.

The key thing in understanding the Ukrainian 2014 coup is in identifying
WHO AUTHORIZED THE POLICE TO ATTACK THE PROTESTORS, knowing it would result in more violence.

Answer: He was known as YATS, the leader of one of the minority fascist parties.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arseniy_Yatsenyuk

In other words, he was instrumental in getting the opposition government to attack the very protesters he had encouraged to demonstrate at the capital. But he also alerted the protesters, because they were ready to deal with the police when they came. So it was a guaranteed violent clash. It was a perfect Alinsky setup to create a crisis.

Did we not see this same thing happen in the Jan 6 protests when it appears evident that the FBI had embedded operatives to incite violence among the crowd? If not, then please explain how some very obvious inciters of violence were not even touched by the justice system while other more innocent people were given the meanest treatment. This is why it is most important to understand the truth of the 2014 Ukraine coup.

F. DEMOCRAT PARTY DESTRUCTION OF ECONOMY:

This brings us to a discussion of taxation and government spending. How to disperse collective funds will always be an issue as long communism exists. Communism is not Commonism and visa versa. And printing more money is not the answer.

Dispersal of collective funds should only be based upon the common agreement of donors. Not by some dictator. Citizen taxes should only go to the protection of citizens, not non citizens. And the dispersal of funds for reparations of non existent damage is an abomination, as is the dispersal of funds to enemy nations. Dispersal of collective funds for health care should be limited to citizens only.

It might be reasonable to allow permanent resident non-citizens to participate in Social Security because it is a forced savings program not funded by citizen taxes. But certainly Social Security should not be extended to foreigners or adversaries.

At the current time, Congress is failing to observe these principles of funding in performing its duties. Republicans have been a big disappointment in countering the destructive Democratic Party that is doing everything it can to destroy this country while printing and spending money irresponsibly.

Categories
CALL FOR ACTION SOLUTIONS TECH

SECURING THE VOTE – WHAT OUR ELECTION SYSTEM SHOULD LOOK LIKE

With the influx of illegal migrants and in view of the wide spread fraud in the 2020 election, a great concern has arisen regarding the integrity of our national election system. What is herein is to suggest a solution to that dilemma.

Our current election system is a piece of crap. It is a hodgepodge of manual and batch systems ripe with fraud. That a secure online real time election system has not been made available by now is an absolute crime. So what would an online real time election system look like?

SECURING THE VOTE:

Well first of all you need to identify and separate citizen residents from non-citizen residents with a unique Voter-ID number. There is now a huge call for a Voter-ID system. More specifically it should be called a citizen id system, and the fact remains we already have it in the form of a State Department Passport ID.

However, not all US citizens have a passport id, meaning they don’t have a citizen id number. So we have to ask if there is not another source of unique citizenship identification that we can merge with passport ids to form a more inclusive voter identification system. And the answer is “yes”. It is the federal medicare system.

So we can develop a unique voter identification system using passport numbers and medicare numbers. A simple unique alpha prefix appended to the passport-ID different from a similar prefix appended to the Medicare-ID would allow the two different number sources to be used as a unique Voter-ID.

But then again, there are still voter eligible citizens who have neither a passport or medicare id. What about them? We must leave that to a little latter when it comes time for them to vote.

THE DATABASE:

What is a database, you ask?
It is a filing organization and access system.
Here is a diagram of what it would look like.

(Too small? On your phone, expand it. On your computer, right click and open image in new tab.)

So how does one read this diagram?

Each box represents a “record type” having a specific data content & format different from the other boxes that represent different “record types”. (Note: the word “record type” is used interchangeably with the word “record”). Boxes at the top are basic entity record types & accessible via their ids. Unconnected diagonal lines into some of these top boxes indicates they are directly accessible. As you can see, there are 4 basic entity record types: year, nation, state, & person.

Lines connecting top level boxes to lower level boxes are links from top level records to lower level record types, thus forming a chain of lower level records. The top level box is said to be the master record type of the lower level detail boxes. For each top level master record there can be any number of lower level detail records.

So for example, given a nation id of USA, one could directly access the USA record & then traverse the state chain to access all the states within the USA. Similarly, one could access all the counties within a state by traversing the county chain. And so on.

Although the default direction of traversal from master to detail records appears to be downward (or forward), upward (or backward) traversal from any detail to master can be possible before a person actually votes. However after vote occurs, traversal in either direction between a voter-ballot-link record and a voter-location-link record should be restricted to the voter for privacy reasons. Today’s average browser-to-website user should not find this method of navigation too difficult to understand.

FEDERAL DATABASE RESIDENCY & ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES:

The database would be maintained on a federal computer, where the feds would initialize Voter-ID records from a cleaned version of the State Department’s passport system allowing only citizen records to be used, non-citizen records being excluded. In addition, the feds would initialize the Nation and State ID records for each state , these being fixed entities. And for each State ID, the feds would create backdoor sign-ons with passwords to be used by the state for its administrative duties.

STATE RESPONSIBILITIES:

In a fashion similar to the feds, each state would be responsible for creating County IDs and would create backdoor sign-ons with passwords for each county to be used by the county for its administrative duties

COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES:

In a fashion similar to the state, each county may elect to setup precincts where it would be responsible for creating Precinct IDs and would create backdoor sign-ons with passwords for each precinct to be used by the precinct workers for their administrative duties in conducting its elections.

Given this initial setup, each state, county, & precinct would have online access to their particular portion in this database file system via their respective id and backdoor logon.

WHO MUST HAVE A VALID VOTER-ID & HOW TO GET ONE:

Every state election worker, every county election worker, every precinct election worker, every candidate, and every voter must be a citizen with a Voter-ID. But as we previously noted, not every US citizen will have a passport or medicare number, & therefore will not have an established unique Voter-ID in the database. This makes it necessary to provide an alternate means of validating citizenship.

An individual, regardless of their level, state, county, precinct or voter
should be able to create a logon in order to make requests, like asking
the next level up to assign a unique Voter-ID after submitting proof of citizenship with picture. In doing so, it should be possible to confirm that the requester does not already have a Voter-ID. If they do not already have a Voter-ID, one will be created for them and linked to their logon. It should be that simple.

Of course, not every body may have a cell phone or computer. In this case they must go into the county registrars office to apply. And if they can’t do that, then a ballot notary is required. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS A BALLOT TO BE PROCESSED THAT DOES NOT HAVE SOME EVIDENCE OF CITIZENSHIP.

CANDIDACY ESTABLISHMENT:

After establishing a Voter-ID, a candidate for an office would have his Voter-ID linked to the office he is running for. This would be administered by the level at which the office exists.

VOTER REGISTRATION & JOINING AN ELECTION:

Of particular importance before each election is the validation and creation of the voter-ballot-link records for each Voter-ID record. This process establishes the voter rolls for each specific election. It begins with a person submitting a voter-id-ballot-request record to an authorized state employee who initiates a search of other states by checking each states registered-voter-year-check record. If no such record is found & everything else checks out on the person, the state employee creates a single year-voter check record, followed by setting up the voter-ballot-link records leaving blank the candidate-selection button in each voter-ballot-link record.

VOTING:

The database is now ready for the voter to make his candidate selections by clicking the appropriate candidate-selection button in each appropriate voter-ballot-link record, at which time a write-permission lock is placed on the voter-ballot-link record. This would prevent anyone from changing candidate-selection button and the corresponding link to the selected candidate record.

POST VOTING RECORD ACCESS:

For secrecy/privacy purposes all cast voter-ballot-link records should be locked from updating by anyone other than the voter and as soon as they are counted. With this one exception, all should be able to view any record at any time, thus providing complete transparency and veracity of an election. In other words, everyone can look anywhere but not touch.

TALLYING UP THE TOTALS:

In addition, currency of vote tabulation is essential. As soon as a voter has locked his voter-ballot record, his vote should be counted and tallies by candidate should be made available. Washington DC should be connected to each state & have access to each state database for the purpose of rolling up ballot totals for each national candidate by state.

KEEPING THE VOTER-ID ROLLS CLEAN:

Currency of the voter rolls is essential and a responsibility of the feds. Voters who have died would have their Voter-ID record flagged as such. But aside from that, there are bad players who would try to vote more than once. This should be averted by looking out for duplicate Voter-ID and ballot requests in & across all states.

PROS:

What would be the advantages of an online real time election system?
First, the election should be completed within 2 days, if not sooner.
Second, the voter would cast his ballot directly into the database, thereby eliminating anybody other than the voter from touching his ballot.
Third, a voters ballot choices would remain unknown to anyone but the voter.
Fourth, since there is only one machine involved, auditing software should be comparatively, making it easy in identifying any other anomalies.

CONS:

There will always be some ding dong who insists on having a paper ballot which necessitates having a batch input system.

Categories
SOLUTIONS

SECURING CHECK WRITING

Before the advent of electronic banking, the use of a paper iou in the form of a check with the payor’s checking account number and hand written signature was sufficient for the bank to diminish the funds in the payor’s checking account. The only danger to the owner of a checking account came from the possibility of another person being able to to perfectly copy the hand written owner’s signature, something very improbable and easy to protect against occurring.

Then came the computer with its ability to perfectly copy the signature of a person. With a picture of the signature of a checking account owner and knowledge of the account number, it became much easier for thieves to do electronic forgery. The question now is, how to minimize this threat. And the answer would appear to be simple.

First, we nust realiaze that in order for the computer to copy a signature it can only do so in graphic mode. So what we need is a non-displayable text mode signature. And with online banking, we already have that non-displayable text mode signature in the form of a password. Therefore, any electronic transaction authorizing a bank to diminsh the funds in a checking account should require the password of the checking account owner. Should a bank fail in providing this security, then it should be held laible for any losses due to its negligence.

Categories
COMMON SENSE SCIENCE SOLUTIONS TECH

The DIRECTION OF MULTIPLICATION

A. THE MEANING OF DIRECTION & SIGNAGE:

   We humans see ourselves in terms of position: vertical upright,
   horizontal on back, & horizontal on side.  These being our most
   common positions relative to Earth, they become the  3  basic
   dimensions that are seen as  3 linear axes orthogonal (at right
   angles) to each other. Furthermore, we think of measurable
   increments along each axis as being in the positive or negative
   direction depending upon their position relative to a zero point
   on the axis.   Such a concept gives us a 3-dimensional reference
   system that we see as absolute, albeit not necessarily so.    

   In mathematics unfortunately the plus and minus signs have two
   different meanings, depending upon the position relative to an
   operand. When touching an operand, it means the value of the
   operand is in the positive or negative direction along a linear axis.
   But it can also mean to add or subtract the operand in the absence
   of an explicit operator between two numbers.  And in the absence
   of a touching sign, the default is in the positive direction. When
   not touching an operand, it means addition or subtraction
   between two operands, ie,  it becomes an operator. So in an
   expression, there can be both directional signs and operational
   signs.

   As a side note & not relevant to this discussion, a minus sign in
   front of an exponent means to raise the reciprocal of the base to
   the power indicated by the exponent.

 

B. IMAGINARY NUMBERS:

   The imaginary number, i, is said to be the square root of -1 which
   is impossible, because according to current convention, there is no
   number multiplied by itself one time that yields a negative number.
   Lacking the ability to determine a numeric value, the square root
   of -1 is assigned the variable, “i” & complex numbers are
   mathematical expressions containing  “i”. A complex number is of
   the form (+or-)a +  (+or-)b * i, where “a” is the numerical offset,
   “b” is the numerical multiplicand, & “i” is the Multiplier. It is rare
   to see i * b, where “i”, as the Multiplier, precedes “b”, as the
   multiplicand. But that is going to change in this writing, as we
   shall soon see.

 

C. THE RULES OF MULTIPLICATION:

   The aforementioned indeterminate problem of not being able to
   evaluate “i” arises from the fact that mathematicians established
   long ago that A MINUS NUMBER TIMES A MINUS
   NUMBER SHOULD BE POSITIVE.  Furthermore, they
   established that THE PRODUCT OF TWO OPPOSITELY
   SIGNED VALUES SHOULD BE NEGATIVE. These
   conclusions arose due to the distributive law of mathematics.
   Let me state here my belief that when it comes to groupings
   via ( ..), the order of operations should dictate that expressions
   within a group should be evaluated first. But I will not quibble
   over the distributive law.

 

D. CURRENT MULTIPLY OPERATIONS IN USE:

   These current-day conventions affecting a change in value
   resulting from multiplication can be expressed as follows:

   Let:
            M = multiplier/operator

             m = multiplicand/operand

              “*” means times,
              (not to be confused with “**” which means exponent of)

             R = resulting product

 

   1. THE  PRODUCTS OF ACCUMULATIVE
       MULTIPLICATION:

      Accumulation Of Positives:
         Plus times Plus = Plus
             +M * +m  =  +R
              Interpretation:
                     Add +m  to the current value  M times.
                  OR GRAPHICALLY,
                     Relative to the current point,
                     go right M times in increments of |m|.  
               Example:
                   +3 * +2 =  +2 + 2 + 2 = 6

      Accumulation Of Negatives:
         Plus times Minus = Minus
            +M * -m  =  -R   
            Interpretation:
                   Add -m  to current value M times.
                OR GRAPHICALLY,
                   Relative to the current point,
                    go left M times in increments of |m|.  
             Example:
                +3  *  -2  =   0  + ( –  2  – 2  – 2)
                                =  0 + – ( 2 + 2   + 2)   =   -6

 

   2. THE  PRODUCTS OF DECUMULATIVE
       MULTIPLICATION:

      Decumulation Of Positives:
         Minus times Plus = Minus  
            -M * +m   =  -R
            Interpretation:
                Subtract +m  from the current value  M  times..
             OR GRAPHICALLY,
                Relative to the current point,
                go left M times in increments of |m|.  
             Example:
                 -3 * +2  =   0  +   -( 2 + 2 + 2)   =    – 6

      Decumulation Of Negatives:
          Minus times Minus = Plus
             -M * -m  =  +R
             Interpretation:
                  Subtract -m  from current value  M  times.
               OR GRAPHICALLY,
                  Relative to the current point,
                  go right M times in increments of |m|.
            Example:
               -3 * -2  = – ( -2) – (-2) – (-2 ) 
                           =  + 2 + 2 +2 = +6 

   Observe that I have identified two different types of multiplication,
   “accumulative” and “decumulative”. I make this distinction
   because accumulative  multiplication requires repetitive addition,
   where decumulative multiplication requires repetitive subtraction.

   Also, we note that the sign of the product resulting from the
   repetitive multiplication of a negative multiplicand  alternates
   between + on even repetitions & – on odd repetitions.  In other
   words, a successive number of subtractions of a negative number
   from itself ALTERNATES BETWEEN + & -.  This alternation
   does not appear anywhere else.  So this behavior is seen as
   unusual. 

 

E. RECONSTRUCTING THE PICTURE OF MULTIPLICATION:

   By insisting that the Multiplier always occurs in front of the
   multiplicand, we can clearly see that, among other things, a
   negative Multiplier means decumulation, whereas a positive
   Multiplier means accumulation. Aside from this fact, we might
   speculate that there could be other meanings in addition. What
   those could be, we are about to find out. 

   Moving on, we might assert that the Multiplier,M, reside on an
   M-axis different from the multiplicand,m, on a separate m-axis,
   with the two axes intersecting each other orthogonally at right
   angles. So the visual graphic of the Multiplier in relation to the
   multiplicand becomes a 2-dimensional planar picture with each
   axis having its own set of + & – directions, rather than just a
   simple 1-dimensional linear graphic.

             THIS                                  NOT JUST THIS

             m-axis
                  |  +                                                                              
       – ——0——- + M-axis        –  ———0———+ M & m
                  | –                              (We are not just talking candy here)

   Given this distinction, we can now begin to think in terms of:

      VECTOR CROSS-MULTIPLICATION,
          (aka, CROSS-MULTIPLICATION
               or
               CROSS-COMPUTATION 
               or
               X-MULTIPLICATION) ,

   versus

      VECTOR DOT-MULTIPLICATION,
          (aka, DOT-MULTIPLICATION
                or
                DOT-COMPUTATION   
                or
                *-MULTIPLICATION
                 or
                 SCALAR-MULTIPLICATION) .

   The difference is as follows.

   Vector dot multiplication results in a simple 1-dimensional product
   (called the dot-product) that resides on the same axis as the
   Multiplier & multiplicand. Up to now, current conventional
   multiplication has always been equivalent to vector dot
   multiplication for both accumulative and decumulative
   multiplication. But that is about to change, as we are about to
   change decumulative multiplication from vector dot to vector
   cross multiplication. The mathematical expression for computing
   the vector cross product is given as:

    R = M * m

   Vector cross multiplication results in a  product (called the
   cross-product) that is uniquely identified with a direction which
   is orthogonal to directions identified by the M-axis & the m-axis.,
   & whose numerical value is the simple product of the two
   numerical values further multiplied by the sine of the smallest
   angle, @, between the two vectors, M and m.  The mathematical
   expression for computing the vector cross product is given as:

   R = M X m = M * m*  sine(@) .

   So we now have two methods of multiplication, with
   cross-multiplication giving us a clearer 3-dimensional/directional
   picture shown as follows.

                   + m-axis              + R-axis  = CROSS PRODUCT AXIS 
                            ^                        /\
                             |                      ‘ 
                             |                  ‘             
                             |            R1 = (M1 X m1) * sine(90) /
                           m1       ‘     
                              |    ‘
      -M————–0———— M1 ——–> + M-axis
                        ‘     |    @ = -90   
                    ‘         |
                ‘             |
            ‘                 |
      -R                  -m   

   We now proceed to examine the deeper meanings of the
   cross-multiplication method.  

 

F. ABOUT THE ANGLE, @,  BETWEEN M & m.

   We’ve started out saying that M-axis was orthogonal to
   m-axis for the sake of simplicity. But the cross-product
   approach says that such is not always the case when it comes
   to vectors, because @ can take on any value between +90
   degrees and -90 degrees as the shortest path between the
   sides of the angle. And this has consequences for both the
   numerical value of the resultant, R, its dimension & its
   positive versus negative directions.        

   Before we go any further, we need to have a clear understanding 
   of how we view angles from a fixed observation point. Then we
   need to know what the sine of an angle is. And finally, we can
   discuss what role the of the angle between the Multiplier &
   multiplicand might be.     

   1. ABOUT PLUS & MINUS ANGLES:

       Envision the face of your clock where the M-axis is a straight
       line running from 12 to 6 in a negative direction & the m-axis
       is a straight line running from 9 to 3 in a positive direction.
       Progressing clockwise, we consider 12 o’clock to be +0
       degrees, & relative to it we recon 3 o’clock to be +90 degrees,
       6 o’clock to be +180 degrees, & 9 o’clock to be  +270 degrees.
       But progressing counter-clockwise from 12 o’clock, we
       consider +270 degrees to be -90 degrees & +180 degrees
       to be -0 degrees. So in this scenario, 12 o’clock is the reference
       side of any angle from it. And because we have aligned the 
       M-axis with 12 o’clock, the M-axis is also the reference side
       of any angle at which the m-axis intersects it.  Furthermore,
       should the M-axis be in a direction other than 12  o’clock,
       then the M-axis should remain the reference side of the 
       angle, @.  

       Therefore, the plus or minus direction of the angle,@,  between
       the M-axis and the m-axis depends upon whether or not we go
       clockwise or counterclockwise from the M-axis to the m-axis.
       And the shortest path from M to m will dictate whether we 
       proceed clockwise or counterclockwise from M.

   2. ABOUT THE SINE OF AN ANGLE:
       Now what about the sine of @? Without going into too much
      detail about what is meant by the sine of an angle, it is enough
       to say that the sine( +0  degrees) is +0, the sine(+90 degrees) is
      +1, the  sine(-0 degrees) is -0, & the sine(-90 degrees) is -1.
      So the sine of an angle acquires the same sign as the sign of the
      angle. If the angle is negative,  its sine is negative. If the angle is
      positive, its sine is positive.

   3. WHICH WAY JOSE, PLUS OR MINUS?:
       We now have to determine in what direction the product
       points, plus or minus, along  the resulting orthogonal axis. 

       Traditional vector math calls for the application of the RIGHT
       HAND THUMB RULE.  Finding this to be a little too
       nebulous to explain, I will only mention that the index
       finger should be the multiplicand. I leave it there.

       As an option, I would suggest discounting the sign of the
       Multiplier and applying the sign arising from the sine(@) 
       to the sign of the multiplicand to determine the sign of the
       resultant.  

 

G. REDEFINING ACCUMULATIVE  VS DECUMULATIVE
   CROSS-MULTIPLICATION:

   Having identified two different, but similar forms of
   multiplication, we now ask,”Are we using the correct form
   of multiplication for each?”. After all, we see some unexplainable
   differences between decumulative & accumulative operations.
   So let’s try applying vector cross-computation to multiplication
   instead of dot-computation. 

   We can now see that cross-multiplication not only results
   in a product pointing in an orthogonal direction away from 
   the directions of the Multiplier & multiplicand, but can
   yield an absolute value entirely different from today’s
   conventional multiplication, especially if the sine(@) is
    other than +1 or -1. Therefore, we ask “Which value(s)
   +1 or -1  would yield the same results as todays
   multiplication”.

   The answer(s) are clear. For accumulative
   multiplication, we need a sine(@) = +1, ie, @ = +90.
   For decumulative multiplication we need sine(@) = -1,
   ie. @ = -90. With this understanding,  we now modify the
   current conventions by simply replacing  the * operator with
   the X operator and adding the (sine @),   making @ = +90
   for  accumulative  & @ = -90 for decunulative
   multiplication. 

   Let:
            M = multiplier/operator

            m = multiplicand/operand

            “*” means times,
            (not to be confused with “**” which means exponent of)

            “X” means vector cross multiplication,
            (not to be confused with  variable “x” )

            “@” is the smallest angle between the M-axis & m-axis.
                    It is plus (+) if the shortest distance
                    from the M-axis to the m-axis is clockwise.
                    It is minus (-) if counterclockwise.   

             R = resulting product

 

   1. ACCUMULATIVE CROSS-MULTIPLICATION:
       For accumulative multiplication, +90 degrees is appropriate.
       In order for the resultant product, R, to become the same
       value as determined by vector dot multiplication, the value
       of sine(@) must equal +1, which means the angle, @, between
       the +M-axis and +m-axis must be  +90  degrees.
        @ = +90,   sine(+90) = +1 

      Accumulation Of Positives: 
         Plus times Plus = Plus 
         R =  +M X (+m)
              = |+M| * (+m) * sine(@) 
              = |+M| * (+m) * sine (+90) 
              = |+M| * (+m) * (+1)
              =  |+M| * (+m)
              = + (M * m)

      Accumulation Of Negatives:
         Plus times Minus = Minus 
         R =  +M X (-m)
              = |+M| * (-m) * sine(@) 
              = |+M| * (-m) * sine (+90) 
              = |+M| * (-m) * (+1)
              = |+M| * (-m)
              = – (M * m) 

   2. DECUMULATIVE CROSS-MULTIPLICATION:
      For decumulative multiplication, -90 degrees works.
      In order for the resultant product, R, to become the same
      value as determined by vector dot multiplication, the value
      of sine(@) must equal -1, which means the angle, @, between
      the +M-axis and +m-axis must be  -90. 
      @ = -90,   sine(-90) = -1

      Decumulation Of Positives: 
         Minus times Plus = Minus 
         R =  -M X (+m)
              = |-M| * (+m) * sine(@) 
              = |-M| * (+m) * sine (-90) 
              = |-M| * (+m) * (-1)
              =  |-M| * (-m)
              = – (M * m)

      Decumulation Of Negatives:
         Minus times Minlus = Plus 
         R =  -M X (-m)
              = |-M| * (-m) * sine(@) 
              = |-M| * (-m) * sine (-90) 
              = |-M| * (-m) * (-1)
              = |-M| * (+m)
              = + (M * m)

 

   Note that I did not recognize or apply the sign of the Multiplier. It
   was unnecessary when the sine(@) was included. Of course, I
   could have made @ = +90 for the decumulative operation. But
   then there still needed to be some explanation for the differences
   from accumulative cross-multiplication.

 

H. THE MYSTERY OF THE FLIP-FLOPPING RESULTANT: 

   1. ABOUT  SUCCESSIVE MULTIPLICATIONS.: 
       The fact that the resultant product of M1 X m1, R1, always
       resides in the direction orthogonal to the plane of the M-axis/
       m-axis, only one possible direction is left in which  R may
       reside, that direction being identified as the R-axis. And if that
       resultant  product, R1, now becomes the multiplicand, m2, of
       a 2nd such computation involving a new M2, then the direction
       of the new resultant  product, R2, must be on the same  axis as
       the previous multiplicand, m1. And  if that product, R2,
       becomes the next multiplicand  m3, on a 3rd such computation,
       then the direction of the new resultant product, R3, must be in
       the same direction as R1.  In other words, given a succession
       of repetitive vector cross-multiplications & where the
       resulting product becomes the next multiplicand, the R-axis
       switches positions with the m-axis & reverses its negative &
       positive directions.          

   2. REPETITIVE
       DECUMULATIVE CROSS-MULTIPLICATION 
       OF NEGATIVE  REAL NUMBERS:

       The placement of the product appears as a positive on the 
       R-axis & as a negative on the m-axis  in alternating order
       due to the right-hand thumb rule flip-flopping with each
       iteration of computing the cross-product.

       This explains why a repetitious negative times a negative 
       equals a positive R1 on the R-axis, followed by a negative
       R2  on the m-axis,  followed by a positive R3  back on the 
       R-axis. It gives the appearance of a pulsating R-axis
       acting as a binary switch between + & -. 

   3. RAISING IMAGINARY  -i TO THE Pth POWER.

       If we conduct a succession of decumulative-cross 
       multiplications of -i , assuming @ = 90 degrees, we get:

        (Cycle begins)

       (-i)**2 = -i  X -i   =  +i**2  =  -1   ( R1 to the R-axis)
                              ______________|                    
                              V
       (-i)**3 = -i X -1  =  -1 X -i  = +i     (R2 to the m-axis)
                               ______________|                    
                               V
        (-i)**4 = -i X +i  =                   +1   (R3 to the R-axis?)
                               ______________|                    
                               V
        (-i)**5 = -i X +1  =                    -i   ( R4 to the m-axis?)
                                                             |
        (Cycle starts over)                       |               
                               _______________|                    
                               V
        (-i)**6 = -i X  -i   =                    -1  (R5 to the R-axis?)                                                             

        Powers of (-i) confirmed by internet.

        Of great interest here is the observation that the successive 
        multiplications oscillate between real rational numbers and
        imaginary irrational + & – i.  We must ask, ” is i the basic 
        unit of measure in the world of irrational numbers?”. 

        NOTE:  e**i*pi = -1     where e is Eulers irrational constant.

 

I. CONCLUSIONS:

   1. We have identified two distinct forms of multiplication, ie,
       accumulative vs decumulative multiplication, the difference
       being the accumulative form is a series of additions whereas
       the decumulative form is a series of subtractions. 
       The sign of the Multiplier, M, identifies which form it is.

   2. We have identified two methods of multiplication, dot-product
        multiplication and cross-product multiplication, We have
        adopted  cross-product as the proper method to be used in both
        accumulative and decumulative multiplication. In doing so,
        we recognize the angle between  between the Multiplier &
        multiplicand to be +90 degrees for accumulative multiplication
        as opposed to -90 degrees for decumulative multiplication. 
        As a result, the sign of the Multiplier does not enter into the 
        computation of the product. 

    3. The angle, @, from the Multiplier to the multiplicand is
           normally +90 degrees in order to make the sine(@) = +1,
           thereby confirming that the M-axis is normally orthogonal
           to the m–axis, albeit not eliminating other possibilities for
           values of angle @, resulting in a wide variety of product
           values and plus or minus direction.

   4. The fact that both operands, M & m,  reside on a different axis
       as vectors means that the communitive law no longer applies,
       disproving the idea that a minus times a plus is the same as
       a plus times a ninus. It becomes like saying
       6 cats are the same as 6 dogs.

   Nothing has been done to change anything outside the realm of
   conventional arithmetic & mathematics.  Rather we have found
   old precepts to be applied in new ways to open the door to
   understanding some areas that left us perplexed. As a result, we
   have uncovered a new way of perceiving multiplication, resulting
   in the identification of decumulative multiplication as distinct
   from traditional accumulative multiplication. We have  uncovered
   some interesting details about how we can graphically interpret
   multiplication that involves what we call “direction” Finally, we
   have shed important new light on an entity that has kept its
   meaning hidden from us for so long,
   ie, the imaginary number,  “i”.    

Categories
SOLUTIONS THE TRUTH

A. THE MULTI-DIMENSIONS OF POLITICS


can leave us confused with terminology if we are not careful. Binary thinking can be myopic and lead to the wrong actions.

Just as there are the 3 contrasting spacial directions of left vs right, up vs down, & forward vs backward, there are contrasting terms to describe political position. So here is a list that is far more than 3 dimensional.

communism vs capitalism
(gov vs
private ownership)


socialism vs individualism
(conformity vs
independence)


fascism vs libertarianism
(restrictive vs
permissive)


liberal vs consevative
(disregard vs
careful thought)


tyranny vs democracy
(one vs
two party rule)

globalism vs nationalism


left vs right
(an aggregate
of the above)

So which would you rather be
FAR LEFT or FAR RIGHT?

(See the movie I DELORES on TUBI)

B. DEMOCRATS vs REPUBLICANS

To be a “Democrat” means you believe in citizen election systems. It is derived from the Greek word, “democracy”. Democrats tend not to believe in a “republican” form of government. To be a “Republican” means you believe in a representative form of government. However, in a “republic” representatives can be appointed or elected. So it is critical to qualify what type of “Republican” one is. Current qualifiers include “left/liberal”, “centrist/moderate”, and “right/conservative”. And these same qualifiers apply to Democrats. However, this somewhat binary description can be misleading if we do not know the difference between “left” and “right”. So it is important to drill down as to the exact meaning, which is the reason for the preceding contrast of terms.

It really matters not whether one is a democrat or republican. What does matter is the specific type of democrat or republican one is. And this is where “socialism” comes in. Socialism stands in contrast to individualism, which means collective conforming demands as opposed to individual independency. The danger exists of demands for conformity turning into demands for compliance, which can turn into tyranny. Socialism can and does often become the pathway the injustice “fascism” or “communism”, and hence, tyranny.

C. GLOBALISM vs NATIONALISM.

A key question to ask ourselves is: Under what circumstances is independence vs unity justified? Commonality is definitely a factor in support of unity. But geographical distance, language and cultural differences are factors supporting independence.

Certainly, a one world government is far from desirable. But neither is a chaotic unruly free for all world.

Moderation in all aspects of life is the best optimization in governing life.

Before the current democrats came along, we had that. But now Biden is crushing it.

D. RHETORIC.

More than likely, the Biden admin sees today’s US nationalists as the equivalent of the violent Irish Republican Army. This is what we call “STEREO TYPING”. And it is completely wrong.

Irish Nationalists want(ed) complete separation and independence from England. US nationalists don’t want separation, BUT MERELY WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO DO ITS JOB PROTECTING THE BORDERS. So the Biden admin has done an immense disservice to US nationalists.

This little history of Irish Republicanism may be where we are in the US.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_republicanism

Further reading of political history reveals that “radicalism” is unique to the left as opposed to “social conservatism”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_radicalism

Today’s Biden admin has all the ear marks of radicalism.

Until seeing the documentary I DELORES, it had always bothered me that the IRA called themselves “Republican”. But that movie showed they considered themselves “SOCIALIST” Republicans as opposed to “TRADITIONAL” Republicans who they hated.

So once again we have socialists waging war and violence. Nothing new.

In 1921 Britain gave independence to Ireland. But six Northern counties wanted to remain in in the UK. This was not good enough for the. greedy IRA. So they began a war of crime and violence, just like all “socialists”.

Socialists call themselves “republican”. But that is a lie, because they only represent themselves. Socialists call themselves “democratic”. But that is a lie, because they do not honor a two party system. Socialists claim to support human rights. But that is a lie, because they cancel freedom of speech and imprison political adversaries.

Socialist politicians exploit minority malcontent to cause violence for the purpose of attaining power over police and military to use in over throwing our form of government. Their ruse has nothing to do with “human rights”. CS LEWIS.
“You might think that your love for humanity is sufficient to justify any other action. BUT THE MINUTE YOU MAKE ONE CAUSE YOUR ENTIRE PURPOSE, YOU FIND YOURSELF FALSIFYING EVIDENCE AND BECOMING A TREACHEROUS PERSON.”

E. WHY I SUPPORT TRUMP

One word… JUSTICE.

Before Obama was elected in 2008, the border crisis was already under way, with California already in the control of left wing nut jobs calling everyone opposed to opened borders a “racist”. And then, Jamiel Shaw, a young black kid just out of high school with a promising football career was shot and murdered by an illegal right in front of his home, while his mother was serving in Iraq. We watched the pain and suffering of this family as they sought justice from the so called “virtuous” democrats in LA who denied this family from being heard and comforted in their loss, thereby exposing once and for all the Democrats absolute lies and hypocrisy.

When Donald Trump was running for POTUS in 2016, his first thing was to give air to Mr Shaw, Jamiel’s father.
Donald Trump is the REAL THING. If you truly want truth and justice, then put him back in charge.

Categories
CALL FOR ACTION SOLUTIONS

POLITICAL SOLUTIONS

Avatar

A PLAN FOR REESTABLISHING POLITICAL EQUILIBRIUM.

Nothing is more dangerous than one political party being in control of everything as is the situation today. In the past we have had a relatively balanced government where neither party had total control of all branches of power. But the last election upset that balance making it possible for the current insanity to reign. So what can we do as citizens to correct the current situation.

First we need to vote entirely Republican in the next two elections. Next, once we have established a balance between political parties, every voter should split his votes between parties.

But this alone is not enough. The bureaucrats have party loyalties that can & have adversely impacted fair elections. The Democrats have no problem endorsing affirmative action based upon skin color. SO WHY NOT HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BASED UPON POLITICAL LOYALTY WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT THAT ASSURES A 50-50 SPLIT POLITICALLY IN THE BUREAUCRACY.

If we are ever to secure our form of government for future generations, this must be done. You know this is the truth.

A PLAN FOR SECURE VOTING

  1. LIMITED INTERNET CONNECTION:
    Let me begin by saying, under no circumstances should the voter registration system be directly connected to the web or internet. However, post election voter ballot verification via the web/internet should be possible & safe.

    With respect to manual ballot processing, it would seem the most efficient method would be an assembly line, where each station records the vote on each specific ballot issue. But then machine reading and issue separation and accumulation is more expedient. So when using a machine vote counting system, under no circumstances should the machine be connected to the internet. To report results, every polling center should have a direct T1 line to the state office. Either that or a dial-in system should be used.

  2. MAIL-IN BALLOT PROCESSING:
    Now to continue on, lets see, you allow mail-in votes to come in and pile up for a entire month without counting them, and then you have in-person voting on election day which is required to be counted before all those piled up mailed in ballots. WELL DAAA, WHAT COULD GO WRONG HERE? WHY??? Why are the mail in votes not counted as they come in? And don’t tell me its more conducive to fraud, because it is less conducive to fraud.

    Paper mail-in ballots for remote voting. Not a good solution. Unrealistic. Drop boxes, ballot harvesting and ranked-choice voting should not be allowed. With respect to signature verification of mail in ballots, it is absolutely asinine to wait to do that after polls have closed. At least do signature verification & start counting mail in ballots as they are received. And by no means allow ballots to be received after the in person polls have closed. Certainly, there is no excuse for not having the total count of the number of received ballots within an hour after the polls have closed. So there is no reason to not have a reliable projection after the received ballot count has been determined.


  3. REAL DIAL-IN VOTING:
    But do away with paper mail in and drop boxes. Go direct call in voting with same day in person. I cant believe that, after the fiasco of 2020, nobody has developed a phone dial in voting system where voters can validate their ballot after its been counted. If you can call your bank and validate transactions, then there is absolutely no reason the same cant be done with voting.

    Why phone and not the web? POTS, the “plain old telephone system” used(s) point-to-point circuit switched networking, not packet switching which is the internet. It is estimated that 40% of the citizens sill have land lines which may or may not be connected to a circuit switched network. However, long haul telephone connections have been or are being upgraded to digital transmission which is the internet . So it is difficult to avoid the internet. But the connections are still basically point-to-point & not accessible via the web with one exception, ie, voice-over-ip providers.

    The web is a client server based network that uses internet connected domain name servers and is relatively less secure than a straight point-to-point connection. Furthermore, cloud based services are web based & to be avoided. This means your real telephone service provider is safer than a virtual phone provider that uses voice-over-ip.

    Now all this may be well and good, but there is one thing to recognize when it comes to the internet and the digitizing of voice transmission. Unlike circuit switched networks, digital networks make it much easier to compress communications store them in files. So what you say over the phone today can be listened to years from now by those running the phone systems. The only real way to protect your communication is via encryption.


x

Categories
SOLUTIONS

PATRIOTIC NEWS SITES

More patriotic news sites than the disgusting broadcast news

https://www.newsmax.com/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/

https://home.frankspeech.com/?frank_pass=true

https://wvwtv.com/live

https://justthenews.com/

AND MANY MORE

Categories
SOLUTIONS

The Real Answer To Abortion and Over Population

https://www.newsmax.com/health/health-news/vasectomy-reversal-men/2020/12/23/id/1002862/

Categories
SOLUTIONS

SECESSION IS NOT WITHOUT PROBLEMS

Where secession could be a solution to our current problems, it may not be the ultimate solution. Why? Because there would be no guarantee that the disgusting offensive liberal democrats who would disrupt the culture could be kept out of the reconstituted country, that is unless a severe restriction and treatment of those people was implemented, including a list identifying all such violent individuals. Let’s face it. There is a sickness in this country as bad as, if not worse than covid-19. It is called TDS, Trump Derrangement Syndrome, which really has less to do with Trump as it does with personal hatred and propensity for violence. A mere secession probably would not stop its spread.

So we ask what is left short of seceding? It is clear that the fighting is going to continue and get a lot rougher and bloodier. There is absolutely no way that what has transpired with respect to this election is in any way acceptable. People simply do not want to live in or under a government that has trashed its Constitution in refusing to uphold it, a government that is built on lies, slander, avarice, complacency and corruption. The only answer is to subdue at all cost the enemy that has hi-jacked our nation. But secession would help to establish a better safe harbor for those not infected with TDS.

Categories
SOLUTIONS

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES. SECESSION ON THE TABLE?

17 states have joined Texas in law suit against 4 renegade states (Pa, Mi, Mn, & Ga) in election fraud to be heard in the Supreme Court, which now makes 1/3 of the states adverse to the manner in which this election was conducted. Negligence on the part of the Supreme Court in this matter is an invitation to civil war. This should be obvious to anyone

.https://www.newsmax.com/…/rush…/2020/12/10/id/1000877/

I never thought I would say this, but if this fraudulent national election is not properly audited and adjudicated , THEN SECESSION SHOULD BE ON THE TABLE. WHO WANTS A GOVERNMENT RUN BY LIARS, CHEATERS, SLANDERERS, and WHO BASTARDIZE THE CONSTITUTION INTO COMPLETE CORRUPTION?

States Seceding From The Union? Who would blame them? Why continue to take part in a hypocritical corrupt government that refuses to mend its fraudulent election system? It is not that we want a specific person to win. Rather it is we want a government that is fair, transparent, honest, and true to its citizens. At this point, we have none of that in our government. It is really a complete disgrace and has been for years, excluding the work of President Trump.

“BUT”, you say, “What about national security?”. WHAT NATIONAL SECURITY? THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO DESTROY OUR NATIONAL SECURITY, including open borders, selling 20% of our uranium to Russia, giving billions to Iran, making back office deals with China and the Ukraine, allowing violence & terrorism to flourish in Oregon, Washington, etc, letting violent murderers out of prison, defunding police, threatening to eliminate the 2nd amendment, ………just to mention a few things.

Are we really so dependent upon the current national government that we cant live without it and have to conform to its negligence, treason and lawlessness? There is a word for that. It’s called EXTORTION, one of the oldest mobster scams in the book. And as long as you bow to it, you are a slave.

Texas, which has taken the lead in prosecuting this fraudulent election and where mention of secession is being made, would certainly make sense as a separate national regime head since it sits on huge oil reserves. And it would be nice to have at least one place in the northern part of the western hemisphere where conservatives would not have to put up with liberal nonsense.

But of course, the old regime would insist upon those seceding states to remain in the Union, and visit war upon them just as the western Ukraine did to its eastern part in 2013-14. It is unbecoming of a regime to behave like a tyrannical husband who says “You can’t leave me or I’ll kill you”. Tyranny is ever present even in those places where those in power claim to be humanitarian and democratic. So a hot war could be expected.

This would take us to the question of the US military intervention. Soldiers took an oath to uphold the US Constitution. But the US Constitution is continuously trampled over by hypocritical liberal democrats. So the question for soldiers should be, which side will uphold the principles set forth in the Constitution, not who is in power?

This would not be the same as the Civil War of old where slavery was the main issue, and against which the northern states were justified. Rather the issue would be over the corruption of the existing federal government. However, it is interesting to note that those states joining with Texas in its law suit are more or less the same states that formed the old Confederate nation with a few other states which were part of Lincoln’s Union. Of course, the existing regime will falsely accuse those states of being “racists” or some other false accusation for the purposes of propaganda. But this is nothing more than an outright lie perpetrated by the lying liberal left.

In the absence of separate regimes, the only other possibility better than continuing down the path of hypocritical liberal corruption is to allow what happened in Chile back a few decades ago, ie, a military junta taking over government control. But there is no guarantee of that working out favorably either.