Our current election system is a piece of crap. It is a hodgepodge of manual and batch systems ripe with fraud. That an online real time election system has not been made available by now is an absolute crime. So what would an online real time election system look like?

We start with the actual database? What is a database, you ask?
It is a filing organization and access system.
Here is a diagram of what it would look like.

(Too small? On your phone, expand it. On your computer, right click and open image in new tab.)

So how does one read this diagram?

Each box represents a “record type” having a specific data content & format different from the other boxes that represent different “record types”. (Note: the word “record type” is used interchangeably with the word “record”). Boxes at the top are basic entity record types & accessible via their ids. Unconnected diagonal lines into some of these top boxes indicates they are directly accessible. As you can see, there are 4 basic entity record types: year, nation, state, & person.

Lines connecting top level boxes to lower level boxes are links from top level records to lower level record types, thus forming a chain of lower level records. The top level box is said to be the master record type of the lower level detail boxes. For each top level master record there can be any number of lower level detail records.

So for example, given a nation id of USA, one could directly access the USA record & then traverse the state chain to access all the states within the USA. Similarly, one could access all the counties within a state by traversing the county chain. And so on.

Although the default direction of traversal from master to detail records appears to be downward (or forward), upward (or backward) traversal from any detail to master can be possible before a person actually votes. However after vote occurs, traversal in either direction between a voter-ballot-link record and a voter-location-link record should be restricted to the voter for privacy reasons. Today’s average browser-to-website user should not find this method of navigation too difficult to understand.


Each state would have this database file system accessible to the public via their website on their own computer. The database would be initialized only one time with the geographic records of nation, state and counties, these being fixed entities. But before participating in an election, each state resident voter, including state & county employees, must already have or create their own reusable logon id record. Only state & county employee logons should be allowed to update the entire database for the purposes of setting up the database content.


Of particular importance before each election is the validation and creation of the voter-ballot-link records for each logon record. This process establishes the voter rolls for each specific election. It begins with a person submitting a voter-id-ballot-request record to an authorized state employee who initiates a search of other states by checking each states registered-voter-year-check record. If no such record is found & everything else checks out on the person, the state employee creates a single year-voter check record, followed by setting up the voter-ballot-link records leaving blank the candidate-selection button in each voter-ballot-link record.


The database is now ready for the voter to make his candidate selections by clicking the appropriate candidate-selection button in each appropriate voter-ballot-link record, at which time a write-permission lock is placed on the voter-ballot-link record. This would prevent anyone from changing candidate-selection button and the corresponding link to the selected candidate record.


For secrecy/privacy purposes all cast voter-ballot-link records should be locked from updating by anyone other than the voter and as soon as they are counted. With this one exception, all should be able to view any record at any time, thus providing complete transparency and veracity of an election. In other words, everyone can look anywhere but not touch.

Each state would have the same file system within a website on their own computer. In addition to state residents being able to create and logons to the state website, each state computer would have access to other state computers to eliminate double dipping voters who might try to vote in more than one state. Currency of voter rolls is essential.

In addition, currency of vote tabulation is essential. As soon as a voter has locked his voter-ballot record, his vote should be counted and tallies by candidate should be made available. Washington DC should be connected to each state & have access to each state database for the purpose of rolling up ballot totals for each national candidate by state.

What would be the advantages of an online real time election system?
First, the voter would cast his ballot directly into the database, thereby eliminating anybody other than the voter from touching his ballot.
Second, the election should be completed within 2 days.
Third. since there is only one machine per state involved, auditing software should be comparatively easy as well as identifying any other anomalies.


There will always be some ding dong who insists on having a paper ballot which necessitates having a batch input system.



Before the advent of electronic banking, the use of a paper iou in the form of a check with the payor’s checking account number and hand written signature was sufficient for the bank to diminish the funds in the payor’s checking account. The only danger to the owner of a checking account came from the possibility of another person being able to to perfectly copy the hand written owner’s signature, something very improbable and easy to protect against occurring.

Then came the computer with its ability to perfectly copy the signature of a person. With a picture of the signature of a checking account owner and knowledge of the account number, it became much easier for thieves to do electronic forgery. The question now is, how to minimize this threat. And the answer would appear to be simple.

First, we nust realiaze that in order for the computer to copy a signature it can only do so in graphic mode. So what we need is a non-displayable text mode signature. And with online banking, we already have that non-displayable text mode signature in the form of a password. Therefore, any electronic transaction authorizing a bank to diminsh the funds in a checking account should require the password of the checking account owner. Should a bank fail in providing this security, then it should be held laible for any losses due to its negligence.




   We humans see ourselves in terms of position: vertical upright,
   horizontal on back, & horizontal on side.  These being our most
   common positions relative to Earth, they become the  3  basic
   dimensions that are seen as  3 linear axes orthogonal (at right
   angles) to each other. Furthermore, we think of measurable
   increments along each axis as being in the positive or negative
   direction depending upon their position relative to a zero point
   on the axis.   Such a concept gives us a 3-dimensional reference
   system that we see as absolute, albeit not necessarily so.    

   In mathematics unfortunately the plus and minus signs have two
   different meanings, depending upon the position relative to an
   operand. When touching an operand, it means the value of the
   operand is in the positive or negative direction along a linear axis.
   But it can also mean to add or subtract the operand in the absence
   of an explicit operator between two numbers.  And in the absence
   of a touching sign, the default is in the positive direction. When
   not touching an operand, it means addition or subtraction
   between two operands, ie,  it becomes an operator. So in an
   expression, there can be both directional signs and operational

   As a side note & not relevant to this discussion, a minus sign in
   front of an exponent means to raise the reciprocal of the base to
   the power indicated by the exponent.



   The imaginary number, i, is said to be the square root of -1 which
   is impossible, because according to current convention, there is no
   number multiplied by itself one time that yields a negative number.
   Lacking the ability to determine a numeric value, the square root
   of -1 is assigned the variable, “i” & complex numbers are
   mathematical expressions containing  “i”. A complex number is of
   the form (+or-)a +  (+or-)b * i, where “a” is the numerical offset,
   “b” is the numerical multiplicand, & “i” is the Multiplier. It is rare
   to see i * b, where “i”, as the Multiplier, precedes “b”, as the
   multiplicand. But that is going to change in this writing, as we
   shall soon see.



   The aforementioned indeterminate problem of not being able to
   evaluate “i” arises from the fact that mathematicians established
   NUMBER SHOULD BE POSITIVE.  Furthermore, they
   conclusions arose due to the distributive law of mathematics.
   Let me state here my belief that when it comes to groupings
   via ( ..), the order of operations should dictate that expressions
   within a group should be evaluated first. But I will not quibble
   over the distributive law.



   These current-day conventions affecting a change in value
   resulting from multiplication can be expressed as follows:

            M = multiplier/operator

             m = multiplicand/operand

              “*” means times,
              (not to be confused with “**” which means exponent of)

             R = resulting product



      Accumulation Of Positives:
         Plus times Plus = Plus
             +M * +m  =  +R
                     Add +m  to the current value  M times.
                  OR GRAPHICALLY,
                     Relative to the current point,
                     go right M times in increments of |m|.  
                   +3 * +2 =  +2 + 2 + 2 = 6

      Accumulation Of Negatives:
         Plus times Minus = Minus
            +M * -m  =  -R   
                   Add -m  to current value M times.
                OR GRAPHICALLY,
                   Relative to the current point,
                    go left M times in increments of |m|.  
                +3  *  -2  =   0  + ( –  2  – 2  – 2)
                                =  0 + – ( 2 + 2   + 2)   =   -6



      Decumulation Of Positives:
         Minus times Plus = Minus  
            -M * +m   =  -R
                Subtract +m  from the current value  M  times..
             OR GRAPHICALLY,
                Relative to the current point,
                go left M times in increments of |m|.  
                 -3 * +2  =   0  +   -( 2 + 2 + 2)   =    – 6

      Decumulation Of Negatives:
          Minus times Minus = Plus
             -M * -m  =  +R
                  Subtract -m  from current value  M  times.
               OR GRAPHICALLY,
                  Relative to the current point,
                  go right M times in increments of |m|.
               -3 * -2  = – ( -2) – (-2) – (-2 ) 
                           =  + 2 + 2 +2 = +6 

   Observe that I have identified two different types of multiplication,
   “accumulative” and “decumulative”. I make this distinction
   because accumulative  multiplication requires repetitive addition,
   where decumulative multiplication requires repetitive subtraction.

   Also, we note that the sign of the product resulting from the
   repetitive multiplication of a negative multiplicand  alternates
   between + on even repetitions & – on odd repetitions.  In other
   words, a successive number of subtractions of a negative number
   from itself ALTERNATES BETWEEN + & -.  This alternation
   does not appear anywhere else.  So this behavior is seen as



   By insisting that the Multiplier always occurs in front of the
   multiplicand, we can clearly see that, among other things, a
   negative Multiplier means decumulation, whereas a positive
   Multiplier means accumulation. Aside from this fact, we might
   speculate that there could be other meanings in addition. What
   those could be, we are about to find out. 

   Moving on, we might assert that the Multiplier,M, reside on an
   M-axis different from the multiplicand,m, on a separate m-axis,
   with the two axes intersecting each other orthogonally at right
   angles. So the visual graphic of the Multiplier in relation to the
   multiplicand becomes a 2-dimensional planar picture with each
   axis having its own set of + & – directions, rather than just a
   simple 1-dimensional linear graphic.

             THIS                                  NOT JUST THIS

                  |  +                                                                              
       – ——0——- + M-axis        –  ———0———+ M & m
                  | –                              (We are not just talking candy here)

   Given this distinction, we can now begin to think in terms of:

               X-MULTIPLICATION) ,


          (aka, DOT-MULTIPLICATION
                 SCALAR-MULTIPLICATION) .

   The difference is as follows.

   Vector dot multiplication results in a simple 1-dimensional product
   (called the dot-product) that resides on the same axis as the
   Multiplier & multiplicand. Up to now, current conventional
   multiplication has always been equivalent to vector dot
   multiplication for both accumulative and decumulative
   multiplication. But that is about to change, as we are about to
   change decumulative multiplication from vector dot to vector
   cross multiplication. The mathematical expression for computing
   the vector cross product is given as:

    R = M * m

   Vector cross multiplication results in a  product (called the
   cross-product) that is uniquely identified with a direction which
   is orthogonal to directions identified by the M-axis & the m-axis.,
   & whose numerical value is the simple product of the two
   numerical values further multiplied by the sine of the smallest
   angle, @, between the two vectors, M and m.  The mathematical
   expression for computing the vector cross product is given as:

   R = M X m = M * m*  sine(@) .

   So we now have two methods of multiplication, with
   cross-multiplication giving us a clearer 3-dimensional/directional
   picture shown as follows.

                   + m-axis              + R-axis  = CROSS PRODUCT AXIS 
                            ^                        /\
                             |                      ‘ 
                             |                  ‘             
                             |            R1 = (M1 X m1) * sine(90) /
                           m1       ‘     
                              |    ‘
      -M————–0———— M1 ——–> + M-axis
                        ‘     |    @ = -90   
                    ‘         |
                ‘             |
            ‘                 |
      -R                  -m   

   We now proceed to examine the deeper meanings of the
   cross-multiplication method.  



   We’ve started out saying that M-axis was orthogonal to
   m-axis for the sake of simplicity. But the cross-product
   approach says that such is not always the case when it comes
   to vectors, because @ can take on any value between +90
   degrees and -90 degrees as the shortest path between the
   sides of the angle. And this has consequences for both the
   numerical value of the resultant, R, its dimension & its
   positive versus negative directions.        

   Before we go any further, we need to have a clear understanding 
   of how we view angles from a fixed observation point. Then we
   need to know what the sine of an angle is. And finally, we can
   discuss what role the of the angle between the Multiplier &
   multiplicand might be.     


       Envision the face of your clock where the M-axis is a straight
       line running from 12 to 6 in a negative direction & the m-axis
       is a straight line running from 9 to 3 in a positive direction.
       Progressing clockwise, we consider 12 o’clock to be +0
       degrees, & relative to it we recon 3 o’clock to be +90 degrees,
       6 o’clock to be +180 degrees, & 9 o’clock to be  +270 degrees.
       But progressing counter-clockwise from 12 o’clock, we
       consider +270 degrees to be -90 degrees & +180 degrees
       to be -0 degrees. So in this scenario, 12 o’clock is the reference
       side of any angle from it. And because we have aligned the 
       M-axis with 12 o’clock, the M-axis is also the reference side
       of any angle at which the m-axis intersects it.  Furthermore,
       should the M-axis be in a direction other than 12  o’clock,
       then the M-axis should remain the reference side of the 
       angle, @.  

       Therefore, the plus or minus direction of the angle,@,  between
       the M-axis and the m-axis depends upon whether or not we go
       clockwise or counterclockwise from the M-axis to the m-axis.
       And the shortest path from M to m will dictate whether we 
       proceed clockwise or counterclockwise from M.

       Now what about the sine of @? Without going into too much
      detail about what is meant by the sine of an angle, it is enough
       to say that the sine( +0  degrees) is +0, the sine(+90 degrees) is
      +1, the  sine(-0 degrees) is -0, & the sine(-90 degrees) is -1.
      So the sine of an angle acquires the same sign as the sign of the
      angle. If the angle is negative,  its sine is negative. If the angle is
      positive, its sine is positive.

       We now have to determine in what direction the product
       points, plus or minus, along  the resulting orthogonal axis. 

       Traditional vector math calls for the application of the RIGHT
       HAND THUMB RULE.  Finding this to be a little too
       nebulous to explain, I will only mention that the index
       finger should be the multiplicand. I leave it there.

       As an option, I would suggest discounting the sign of the
       Multiplier and applying the sign arising from the sine(@) 
       to the sign of the multiplicand to determine the sign of the



   Having identified two different, but similar forms of
   multiplication, we now ask,”Are we using the correct form
   of multiplication for each?”. After all, we see some unexplainable
   differences between decumulative & accumulative operations.
   So let’s try applying vector cross-computation to multiplication
   instead of dot-computation. 

   We can now see that cross-multiplication not only results
   in a product pointing in an orthogonal direction away from 
   the directions of the Multiplier & multiplicand, but can
   yield an absolute value entirely different from today’s
   conventional multiplication, especially if the sine(@) is
    other than +1 or -1. Therefore, we ask “Which value(s)
   +1 or -1  would yield the same results as todays

   The answer(s) are clear. For accumulative
   multiplication, we need a sine(@) = +1, ie, @ = +90.
   For decumulative multiplication we need sine(@) = -1,
   ie. @ = -90. With this understanding,  we now modify the
   current conventions by simply replacing  the * operator with
   the X operator and adding the (sine @),   making @ = +90
   for  accumulative  & @ = -90 for decunulative

            M = multiplier/operator

            m = multiplicand/operand

            “*” means times,
            (not to be confused with “**” which means exponent of)

            “X” means vector cross multiplication,
            (not to be confused with  variable “x” )

            “@” is the smallest angle between the M-axis & m-axis.
                    It is plus (+) if the shortest distance
                    from the M-axis to the m-axis is clockwise.
                    It is minus (-) if counterclockwise.   

             R = resulting product


       For accumulative multiplication, +90 degrees is appropriate.
       In order for the resultant product, R, to become the same
       value as determined by vector dot multiplication, the value
       of sine(@) must equal +1, which means the angle, @, between
       the +M-axis and +m-axis must be  +90  degrees.
        @ = +90,   sine(+90) = +1 

      Accumulation Of Positives: 
         Plus times Plus = Plus 
         R =  +M X (+m)
              = |+M| * (+m) * sine(@) 
              = |+M| * (+m) * sine (+90) 
              = |+M| * (+m) * (+1)
              =  |+M| * (+m)
              = + (M * m)

      Accumulation Of Negatives:
         Plus times Minus = Minus 
         R =  +M X (-m)
              = |+M| * (-m) * sine(@) 
              = |+M| * (-m) * sine (+90) 
              = |+M| * (-m) * (+1)
              = |+M| * (-m)
              = – (M * m) 

      For decumulative multiplication, -90 degrees works.
      In order for the resultant product, R, to become the same
      value as determined by vector dot multiplication, the value
      of sine(@) must equal -1, which means the angle, @, between
      the +M-axis and +m-axis must be  -90. 
      @ = -90,   sine(-90) = -1

      Decumulation Of Positives: 
         Minus times Plus = Minus 
         R =  -M X (+m)
              = |-M| * (+m) * sine(@) 
              = |-M| * (+m) * sine (-90) 
              = |-M| * (+m) * (-1)
              =  |-M| * (-m)
              = – (M * m)

      Decumulation Of Negatives:
         Minus times Minlus = Plus 
         R =  -M X (-m)
              = |-M| * (-m) * sine(@) 
              = |-M| * (-m) * sine (-90) 
              = |-M| * (-m) * (-1)
              = |-M| * (+m)
              = + (M * m)


   Note that I did not recognize or apply the sign of the Multiplier. It
   was unnecessary when the sine(@) was included. Of course, I
   could have made @ = +90 for the decumulative operation. But
   then there still needed to be some explanation for the differences
   from accumulative cross-multiplication.



       The fact that the resultant product of M1 X m1, R1, always
       resides in the direction orthogonal to the plane of the M-axis/
       m-axis, only one possible direction is left in which  R may
       reside, that direction being identified as the R-axis. And if that
       resultant  product, R1, now becomes the multiplicand, m2, of
       a 2nd such computation involving a new M2, then the direction
       of the new resultant  product, R2, must be on the same  axis as
       the previous multiplicand, m1. And  if that product, R2,
       becomes the next multiplicand  m3, on a 3rd such computation,
       then the direction of the new resultant product, R3, must be in
       the same direction as R1.  In other words, given a succession
       of repetitive vector cross-multiplications & where the
       resulting product becomes the next multiplicand, the R-axis
       switches positions with the m-axis & reverses its negative &
       positive directions.          


       The placement of the product appears as a positive on the 
       R-axis & as a negative on the m-axis  in alternating order
       due to the right-hand thumb rule flip-flopping with each
       iteration of computing the cross-product.

       This explains why a repetitious negative times a negative 
       equals a positive R1 on the R-axis, followed by a negative
       R2  on the m-axis,  followed by a positive R3  back on the 
       R-axis. It gives the appearance of a pulsating R-axis
       acting as a binary switch between + & -. 


       If we conduct a succession of decumulative-cross 
       multiplications of -i , assuming @ = 90 degrees, we get:

        (Cycle begins)

       (-i)**2 = -i  X -i   =  +i**2  =  -1   ( R1 to the R-axis)
       (-i)**3 = -i X -1  =  -1 X -i  = +i     (R2 to the m-axis)
        (-i)**4 = -i X +i  =                   +1   (R3 to the R-axis?)
        (-i)**5 = -i X +1  =                    -i   ( R4 to the m-axis?)
        (Cycle starts over)                       |               
        (-i)**6 = -i X  -i   =                    -1  (R5 to the R-axis?)                                                             

        Powers of (-i) confirmed by internet.

        Of great interest here is the observation that the successive 
        multiplications oscillate between real rational numbers and
        imaginary irrational + & – i.  We must ask, ” is i the basic 
        unit of measure in the world of irrational numbers?”. 

        NOTE:  e**i*pi = -1     where e is Eulers irrational constant.



   1. We have identified two distinct forms of multiplication, ie,
       accumulative vs decumulative multiplication, the difference
       being the accumulative form is a series of additions whereas
       the decumulative form is a series of subtractions. 
       The sign of the Multiplier, M, identifies which form it is.

   2. We have identified two methods of multiplication, dot-product
        multiplication and cross-product multiplication, We have
        adopted  cross-product as the proper method to be used in both
        accumulative and decumulative multiplication. In doing so,
        we recognize the angle between  between the Multiplier &
        multiplicand to be +90 degrees for accumulative multiplication
        as opposed to -90 degrees for decumulative multiplication. 
        As a result, the sign of the Multiplier does not enter into the 
        computation of the product. 

    3. The angle, @, from the Multiplier to the multiplicand is
           normally +90 degrees in order to make the sine(@) = +1,
           thereby confirming that the M-axis is normally orthogonal
           to the m–axis, albeit not eliminating other possibilities for
           values of angle @, resulting in a wide variety of product
           values and plus or minus direction.

   4. The fact that both operands, M & m,  reside on a different axis
       as vectors means that the communitive law no longer applies,
       disproving the idea that a minus times a plus is the same as
       a plus times a ninus. It becomes like saying
       6 cats are the same as 6 dogs.

   Nothing has been done to change anything outside the realm of
   conventional arithmetic & mathematics.  Rather we have found
   old precepts to be applied in new ways to open the door to
   understanding some areas that left us perplexed. As a result, we
   have uncovered a new way of perceiving multiplication, resulting
   in the identification of decumulative multiplication as distinct
   from traditional accumulative multiplication. We have  uncovered
   some interesting details about how we can graphically interpret
   multiplication that involves what we call “direction” Finally, we
   have shed important new light on an entity that has kept its
   meaning hidden from us for so long,
   ie, the imaginary number,  “i”.    



can leave us confused with terminology if we are not careful. Binary thinking can be myopic and lead to the wrong actions.

Just as there are the 3 contrasting spacial directions of left vs right, up vs down, & forward vs backward, there are contrasting terms to describe political position. So here is a list that is far more than 3 dimensional.

communism vs capitalism
(gov vs
private ownership)

socialism vs individualism
(conformity vs

fascism vs libertarianism
(restrictive vs

liberal vs consevative
(disregard vs
careful thought)

tyranny vs democracy
(one vs
two party rule)

globalism vs nationalism

left vs right
(an aggregate
of the above)

So which would you rather be

(See the movie I DELORES on TUBI)


To be a “Democrat” means you believe in citizen election systems. It is derived from the Greek word, “democracy”. Democrats tend not to believe in a “republican” form of government. To be a “Republican” means you believe in a representative form of government. However, in a “republic” representatives can be appointed or elected. So it is critical to qualify what type of “Republican” one is. Current qualifiers include “left/liberal”, “centrist/moderate”, and “right/conservative”. And these same qualifiers apply to Democrats. However, this somewhat binary description can be misleading if we do not know the difference between “left” and “right”. So it is important to drill down as to the exact meaning, which is the reason for the preceding contrast of terms.

It really matters not whether one is a democrat or republican. What does matter is the specific type of democrat or republican one is. And this is where “socialism” comes in. Socialism stands in contrast to individualism, which means collective conforming demands as opposed to individual independency. The danger exists of demands for conformity turning into demands for compliance, which can turn into tyranny. Socialism can and does often become the pathway the injustice “fascism” or “communism”, and hence, tyranny.


A key question to ask ourselves is: Under what circumstances is independence vs unity justified? Commonality is definitely a factor in support of unity. But geographical distance, language and cultural differences are factors supporting independence.

Certainly, a one world government is far from desirable. But neither is a chaotic unruly free for all world.

Moderation in all aspects of life is the best optimization in governing life.

Before the current democrats came along, we had that. But now Biden is crushing it.


More than likely, the Biden admin sees today’s US nationalists as the equivalent of the violent Irish Republican Army. This is what we call “STEREO TYPING”. And it is completely wrong.

Irish Nationalists want(ed) complete separation and independence from England. US nationalists don’t want separation, BUT MERELY WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO DO ITS JOB PROTECTING THE BORDERS. So the Biden admin has done an immense disservice to US nationalists.

This little history of Irish Republicanism may be where we are in the US.

Further reading of political history reveals that “radicalism” is unique to the left as opposed to “social conservatism”

Today’s Biden admin has all the ear marks of radicalism.

Until seeing the documentary I DELORES, it had always bothered me that the IRA called themselves “Republican”. But that movie showed they considered themselves “SOCIALIST” Republicans as opposed to “TRADITIONAL” Republicans who they hated.

So once again we have socialists waging war and violence. Nothing new.

In 1921 Britain gave independence to Ireland. But six Northern counties wanted to remain in in the UK. This was not good enough for the. greedy IRA. So they began a war of crime and violence, just like all “socialists”.

Socialists call themselves “republican”. But that is a lie, because they only represent themselves. Socialists call themselves “democratic”. But that is a lie, because they do not honor a two party system. Socialists claim to support human rights. But that is a lie, because they cancel freedom of speech and imprison political adversaries.

Socialist politicians exploit minority malcontent to cause violence for the purpose of attaining power over police and military to use in over throwing our form of government. Their ruse has nothing to do with “human rights”. CS LEWIS.
“You might think that your love for humanity is sufficient to justify any other action. BUT THE MINUTE YOU MAKE ONE CAUSE YOUR ENTIRE PURPOSE, YOU FIND YOURSELF FALSIFYING EVIDENCE AND BECOMING A TREACHEROUS PERSON.”


One word… JUSTICE.

Before Obama was elected in 2008, the border crisis was already under way, with California already in the control of left wing nut jobs calling everyone opposed to opened borders a “racist”. And then, Jamiel Shaw, a young black kid just out of high school with a promising football career was shot and murdered by an illegal right in front of his home, while his mother was serving in Iraq. We watched the pain and suffering of this family as they sought justice from the so called “virtuous” democrats in LA who denied this family from being heard and comforted in their loss, thereby exposing once and for all the Democrats absolute lies and hypocrisy.

When Donald Trump was running for POTUS in 2016, his first thing was to give air to Mr Shaw, Jamiel’s father.
Donald Trump is the REAL THING. If you truly want truth and justice, then put him back in charge.





Nothing is more dangerous than one political party being in control of everything as is the situation today. In the past we have had a relatively balanced government where neither party had total control of all branches of power. But the last election upset that balance making it possible for the current insanity to reign. So what can we do as citizens to correct the current situation.

First we need to vote entirely Republican in the next two elections. Next, once we have established a balance between political parties, every voter should split his votes between parties.

But this alone is not enough. The bureaucrats have party loyalties that can & have adversely impacted fair elections. The Democrats have no problem endorsing affirmative action based upon skin color. SO WHY NOT HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BASED UPON POLITICAL LOYALTY WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT THAT ASSURES A 50-50 SPLIT POLITICALLY IN THE BUREAUCRACY.

If we are ever to secure our form of government for future generations, this must be done. You know this is the truth.


    Let me begin by saying, under no circumstances should the voter registration system be directly connected to the web or internet. However, post election voter ballot verification via the web/internet should be possible & safe.

    With respect to manual ballot processing, it would seem the most efficient method would be an assembly line, where each station records the vote on each specific ballot issue. But then machine reading and issue separation and accumulation is more expedient. So when using a machine vote counting system, under no circumstances should the machine be connected to the internet. To report results, every polling center should have a direct T1 line to the state office. Either that or a dial-in system should be used.

    Now to continue on, lets see, you allow mail-in votes to come in and pile up for a entire month without counting them, and then you have in-person voting on election day which is required to be counted before all those piled up mailed in ballots. WELL DAAA, WHAT COULD GO WRONG HERE? WHY??? Why are the mail in votes not counted as they come in? And don’t tell me its more conducive to fraud, because it is less conducive to fraud.

    Paper mail-in ballots for remote voting. Not a good solution. Unrealistic. Drop boxes, ballot harvesting and ranked-choice voting should not be allowed. With respect to signature verification of mail in ballots, it is absolutely asinine to wait to do that after polls have closed. At least do signature verification & start counting mail in ballots as they are received. And by no means allow ballots to be received after the in person polls have closed. Certainly, there is no excuse for not having the total count of the number of received ballots within an hour after the polls have closed. So there is no reason to not have a reliable projection after the received ballot count has been determined.

    But do away with paper mail in and drop boxes. Go direct call in voting with same day in person. I cant believe that, after the fiasco of 2020, nobody has developed a phone dial in voting system where voters can validate their ballot after its been counted. If you can call your bank and validate transactions, then there is absolutely no reason the same cant be done with voting.

    Why phone and not the web? POTS, the “plain old telephone system” used(s) point-to-point circuit switched networking, not packet switching which is the internet. It is estimated that 40% of the citizens sill have land lines which may or may not be connected to a circuit switched network. However, long haul telephone connections have been or are being upgraded to digital transmission which is the internet . So it is difficult to avoid the internet. But the connections are still basically point-to-point & not accessible via the web with one exception, ie, voice-over-ip providers.

    The web is a client server based network that uses internet connected domain name servers and is relatively less secure than a straight point-to-point connection. Furthermore, cloud based services are web based & to be avoided. This means your real telephone service provider is safer than a virtual phone provider that uses voice-over-ip.

    Now all this may be well and good, but there is one thing to recognize when it comes to the internet and the digitizing of voice transmission. Unlike circuit switched networks, digital networks make it much easier to compress communications store them in files. So what you say over the phone today can be listened to years from now by those running the phone systems. The only real way to protect your communication is via encryption.




More patriotic news sites than the disgusting broadcast news



The Real Answer To Abortion and Over Population



Where secession could be a solution to our current problems, it may not be the ultimate solution. Why? Because there would be no guarantee that the disgusting offensive liberal democrats who would disrupt the culture could be kept out of the reconstituted country, that is unless a severe restriction and treatment of those people was implemented, including a list identifying all such violent individuals. Let’s face it. There is a sickness in this country as bad as, if not worse than covid-19. It is called TDS, Trump Derrangement Syndrome, which really has less to do with Trump as it does with personal hatred and propensity for violence. A mere secession probably would not stop its spread.

So we ask what is left short of seceding? It is clear that the fighting is going to continue and get a lot rougher and bloodier. There is absolutely no way that what has transpired with respect to this election is in any way acceptable. People simply do not want to live in or under a government that has trashed its Constitution in refusing to uphold it, a government that is built on lies, slander, avarice, complacency and corruption. The only answer is to subdue at all cost the enemy that has hi-jacked our nation. But secession would help to establish a better safe harbor for those not infected with TDS.



17 states have joined Texas in law suit against 4 renegade states (Pa, Mi, Mn, & Ga) in election fraud to be heard in the Supreme Court, which now makes 1/3 of the states adverse to the manner in which this election was conducted. Negligence on the part of the Supreme Court in this matter is an invitation to civil war. This should be obvious to anyone


I never thought I would say this, but if this fraudulent national election is not properly audited and adjudicated , THEN SECESSION SHOULD BE ON THE TABLE. WHO WANTS A GOVERNMENT RUN BY LIARS, CHEATERS, SLANDERERS, and WHO BASTARDIZE THE CONSTITUTION INTO COMPLETE CORRUPTION?

States Seceding From The Union? Who would blame them? Why continue to take part in a hypocritical corrupt government that refuses to mend its fraudulent election system? It is not that we want a specific person to win. Rather it is we want a government that is fair, transparent, honest, and true to its citizens. At this point, we have none of that in our government. It is really a complete disgrace and has been for years, excluding the work of President Trump.

“BUT”, you say, “What about national security?”. WHAT NATIONAL SECURITY? THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO DESTROY OUR NATIONAL SECURITY, including open borders, selling 20% of our uranium to Russia, giving billions to Iran, making back office deals with China and the Ukraine, allowing violence & terrorism to flourish in Oregon, Washington, etc, letting violent murderers out of prison, defunding police, threatening to eliminate the 2nd amendment, ………just to mention a few things.

Are we really so dependent upon the current national government that we cant live without it and have to conform to its negligence, treason and lawlessness? There is a word for that. It’s called EXTORTION, one of the oldest mobster scams in the book. And as long as you bow to it, you are a slave.

Texas, which has taken the lead in prosecuting this fraudulent election and where mention of secession is being made, would certainly make sense as a separate national regime head since it sits on huge oil reserves. And it would be nice to have at least one place in the northern part of the western hemisphere where conservatives would not have to put up with liberal nonsense.

But of course, the old regime would insist upon those seceding states to remain in the Union, and visit war upon them just as the western Ukraine did to its eastern part in 2013-14. It is unbecoming of a regime to behave like a tyrannical husband who says “You can’t leave me or I’ll kill you”. Tyranny is ever present even in those places where those in power claim to be humanitarian and democratic. So a hot war could be expected.

This would take us to the question of the US military intervention. Soldiers took an oath to uphold the US Constitution. But the US Constitution is continuously trampled over by hypocritical liberal democrats. So the question for soldiers should be, which side will uphold the principles set forth in the Constitution, not who is in power?

This would not be the same as the Civil War of old where slavery was the main issue, and against which the northern states were justified. Rather the issue would be over the corruption of the existing federal government. However, it is interesting to note that those states joining with Texas in its law suit are more or less the same states that formed the old Confederate nation with a few other states which were part of Lincoln’s Union. Of course, the existing regime will falsely accuse those states of being “racists” or some other false accusation for the purposes of propaganda. But this is nothing more than an outright lie perpetrated by the lying liberal left.

In the absence of separate regimes, the only other possibility better than continuing down the path of hypocritical liberal corruption is to allow what happened in Chile back a few decades ago, ie, a military junta taking over government control. But there is no guarantee of that working out favorably either.