can leave us confused with terminology if we are not careful. Binary thinking can be myopic and lead to the wrong actions.

Just as there are the 3 contrasting spacial directions of left vs right, up vs down, & forward vs backward, there are contrasting terms to describe political position. So here is a list that is far more than 3 dimensional.

communism vs capitalism
(gov vs
private ownership)

socialism vs individualism
(conformity vs

fascism vs libertarianism
(restrictive vs

liberal vs consevative
(disregard vs
careful thought)

tyranny vs democracy
(one vs
two party rule)

globalism vs nationalism

left vs right
(an aggregate
of the above)

So which would you rather be

(See the movie I DELORES on TUBI)


To be a “Democrat” means you believe in citizen election systems. It is derived from the Greek word, “democracy”. Democrats tend not to believe in a “republican” form of government. To be a “Republican” means you believe in a representative form of government. However, in a “republic” representatives can be appointed or elected. So it is critical to qualify what type of “Republican” one is. Current qualifiers include “left/liberal”, “centrist/moderate”, and “right/conservative”. And these same qualifiers apply to Democrats. However, this somewhat binary description can be misleading if we do not know the difference between “left” and “right”. So it is important to drill down as to the exact meaning, which is the reason for the preceding contrast of terms.

It really matters not whether one is a democrat or republican. What does matter is the specific type of democrat or republican one is. And this is where “socialism” comes in. Socialism stands in contrast to individualism, which means collective conforming demands as opposed to individual independency. The danger exists of demands for conformity turning into demands for compliance, which can turn into tyranny. Socialism can and does often become the pathway the injustice “fascism” or “communism”, and hence, tyranny.


A key question to ask ourselves is: Under what circumstances is independence vs unity justified? Commonality is definitely a factor in support of unity. But geographical distance, language and cultural differences are factors supporting independence.

Certainly, a one world government is far from desirable. But neither is a chaotic unruly free for all world.

Moderation in all aspects of life is the best optimization in governing life.

Before the current democrats came along, we had that. But now Biden is crushing it.


More than likely, the Biden admin sees today’s US nationalists as the equivalent of the violent Irish Republican Army. This is what we call “STEREO TYPING”. And it is completely wrong.

Irish Nationalists want(ed) complete separation and independence from England. US nationalists don’t want separation, BUT MERELY WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO DO ITS JOB PROTECTING THE BORDERS. So the Biden admin has done an immense disservice to US nationalists.

This little history of Irish Republicanism may be where we are in the US.

Further reading of political history reveals that “radicalism” is unique to the left as opposed to “social conservatism”

Today’s Biden admin has all the ear marks of radicalism.

Until seeing the documentary I DELORES, it had always bothered me that the IRA called themselves “Republican”. But that movie showed they considered themselves “SOCIALIST” Republicans as opposed to “TRADITIONAL” Republicans who they hated.

So once again we have socialists waging war and violence. Nothing new.

In 1921 Britain gave independence to Ireland. But six Northern counties wanted to remain in in the UK. This was not good enough for the. greedy IRA. So they began a war of crime and violence, just like all “socialists”.

Socialists call themselves “republican”. But that is a lie, because they only represent themselves. Socialists call themselves “democratic”. But that is a lie, because they do not honor a two party system. Socialists claim to support human rights. But that is a lie, because they cancel freedom of speech and imprison political adversaries.

Socialist politicians exploit minority malcontent to cause violence for the purpose of attaining power over police and military to use in over throwing our form of government. Their ruse has nothing to do with “human rights”. CS LEWIS.
“You might think that your love for humanity is sufficient to justify any other action. BUT THE MINUTE YOU MAKE ONE CAUSE YOUR ENTIRE PURPOSE, YOU FIND YOURSELF FALSIFYING EVIDENCE AND BECOMING A TREACHEROUS PERSON.”


One word… JUSTICE.

Before Obama was elected in 2008, the border crisis was already under way, with California already in the control of left wing nut jobs calling everyone opposed to opened borders a “racist”. And then, Jamiel Shaw, a young black kid just out of high school with a promising football career was shot and murdered by an illegal right in front of his home, while his mother was serving in Iraq. We watched the pain and suffering of this family as they sought justice from the so called “virtuous” democrats in LA who denied this family from being heard and comforted in their loss, thereby exposing once and for all the Democrats absolute lies and hypocrisy.

When Donald Trump was running for POTUS in 2016, his first thing was to give air to Mr Shaw, Jamiel’s father.
Donald Trump is the REAL THING. If you truly want truth and justice, then put him back in charge.





Nothing is more dangerous than one political party being in control of everything as is the situation today. In the past we have had a relatively balanced government where neither party had total control of all branches of power. But the last election upset that balance making it possible for the current insanity to reign. So what can we do as citizens to correct the current situation.

First we need to vote entirely Republican in the next two elections. Next, once we have established a balance between political parties, every voter should split his votes between parties.

But this alone is not enough. The bureaucrats have party loyalties that can & have adversely impacted fair elections. The Democrats have no problem endorsing affirmative action based upon skin color. SO WHY NOT HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BASED UPON POLITICAL LOYALTY WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT THAT ASSURES A 50-50 SPLIT POLITICALLY IN THE BUREAUCRACY.

If we are ever to secure our form of government for future generations, this must be done. You know this is the truth.


    Let me begin by saying, under no circumstances should the voter registration system be directly connected to the web or internet. However, post election voter ballot verification via the web/internet should be possible & safe.

    With respect to manual ballot processing, it would seem the most efficient method would be an assembly line, where each station records the vote on each specific ballot issue. But then machine reading and issue separation and accumulation is more expedient. So when using a machine vote counting system, under no circumstances should the machine be connected to the internet. To report results, every polling center should have a direct T1 line to the state office. Either that or a dial-in system should be used.

    Now to continue on, lets see, you allow mail-in votes to come in and pile up for a entire month without counting them, and then you have in-person voting on election day which is required to be counted before all those piled up mailed in ballots. WELL DAAA, WHAT COULD GO WRONG HERE? WHY??? Why are the mail in votes not counted as they come in? And don’t tell me its more conducive to fraud, because it is less conducive to fraud.

    Paper mail-in ballots for remote voting. Not a good solution. Unrealistic. Drop boxes, ballot harvesting and ranked-choice voting should not be allowed. With respect to signature verification of mail in ballots, it is absolutely asinine to wait to do that after polls have closed. At least do signature verification & start counting mail in ballots as they are received. And by no means allow ballots to be received after the in person polls have closed. Certainly, there is no excuse for not having the total count of the number of received ballots within an hour after the polls have closed. So there is no reason to not have a reliable projection after the received ballot count has been determined.

    But do away with paper mail in and drop boxes. Go direct call in voting with same day in person. I cant believe that, after the fiasco of 2020, nobody has developed a phone dial in voting system where voters can validate their ballot after its been counted. If you can call your bank and validate transactions, then there is absolutely no reason the same cant be done with voting.

    Why phone and not the web? POTS, the “plain old telephone system” used(s) point-to-point circuit switched networking, not packet switching which is the internet. It is estimated that 40% of the citizens sill have land lines which may or may not be connected to a circuit switched network. However, long haul telephone connections have been or are being upgraded to digital transmission which is the internet . So it is difficult to avoid the internet. But the connections are still basically point-to-point & not accessible via the web with one exception, ie, voice-over-ip providers.

    The web is a client server based network that uses internet connected domain name servers and is relatively less secure than a straight point-to-point connection. Furthermore, cloud based services are web based & to be avoided. This means your real telephone service provider is safer than a virtual phone provider that uses voice-over-ip.

    Now all this may be well and good, but there is one thing to recognize when it comes to the internet and the digitizing of voice transmission. Unlike circuit switched networks, digital networks make it much easier to compress communications store them in files. So what you say over the phone today can be listened to years from now by those running the phone systems. The only real way to protect your communication is via encryption.




More patriotic news sites than the disgusting broadcast news




The Real Answer To Abortion and Over Population



Where secession could be a solution to our current problems, it may not be the ultimate solution. Why? Because there would be no guarantee that the disgusting offensive liberal democrats who would disrupt the culture could be kept out of the reconstituted country, that is unless a severe restriction and treatment of those people was implemented, including a list identifying all such violent individuals. Let’s face it. There is a sickness in this country as bad as, if not worse than covid-19. It is called TDS, Trump Derrangement Syndrome, which really has less to do with Trump as it does with personal hatred and propensity for violence. A mere secession probably would not stop its spread.

So we ask what is left short of seceding? It is clear that the fighting is going to continue and get a lot rougher and bloodier. There is absolutely no way that what has transpired with respect to this election is in any way acceptable. People simply do not want to live in or under a government that has trashed its Constitution in refusing to uphold it, a government that is built on lies, slander, avarice, complacency and corruption. The only answer is to subdue at all cost the enemy that has hi-jacked our nation. But secession would help to establish a better safe harbor for those not infected with TDS.



17 states have joined Texas in law suit against 4 renegade states (Pa, Mi, Mn, & Ga) in election fraud to be heard in the Supreme Court, which now makes 1/3 of the states adverse to the manner in which this election was conducted. Negligence on the part of the Supreme Court in this matter is an invitation to civil war. This should be obvious to anyone


I never thought I would say this, but if this fraudulent national election is not properly audited and adjudicated , THEN SECESSION SHOULD BE ON THE TABLE. WHO WANTS A GOVERNMENT RUN BY LIARS, CHEATERS, SLANDERERS, and WHO BASTARDIZE THE CONSTITUTION INTO COMPLETE CORRUPTION?

States Seceding From The Union? Who would blame them? Why continue to take part in a hypocritical corrupt government that refuses to mend its fraudulent election system? It is not that we want a specific person to win. Rather it is we want a government that is fair, transparent, honest, and true to its citizens. At this point, we have none of that in our government. It is really a complete disgrace and has been for years, excluding the work of President Trump.

“BUT”, you say, “What about national security?”. WHAT NATIONAL SECURITY? THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO DESTROY OUR NATIONAL SECURITY, including open borders, selling 20% of our uranium to Russia, giving billions to Iran, making back office deals with China and the Ukraine, allowing violence & terrorism to flourish in Oregon, Washington, etc, letting violent murderers out of prison, defunding police, threatening to eliminate the 2nd amendment, ………just to mention a few things.

Are we really so dependent upon the current national government that we cant live without it and have to conform to its negligence, treason and lawlessness? There is a word for that. It’s called EXTORTION, one of the oldest mobster scams in the book. And as long as you bow to it, you are a slave.

Texas, which has taken the lead in prosecuting this fraudulent election and where mention of secession is being made, would certainly make sense as a separate national regime head since it sits on huge oil reserves. And it would be nice to have at least one place in the northern part of the western hemisphere where conservatives would not have to put up with liberal nonsense.

But of course, the old regime would insist upon those seceding states to remain in the Union, and visit war upon them just as the western Ukraine did to its eastern part in 2013-14. It is unbecoming of a regime to behave like a tyrannical husband who says “You can’t leave me or I’ll kill you”. Tyranny is ever present even in those places where those in power claim to be humanitarian and democratic. So a hot war could be expected.

This would take us to the question of the US military intervention. Soldiers took an oath to uphold the US Constitution. But the US Constitution is continuously trampled over by hypocritical liberal democrats. So the question for soldiers should be, which side will uphold the principles set forth in the Constitution, not who is in power?

This would not be the same as the Civil War of old where slavery was the main issue, and against which the northern states were justified. Rather the issue would be over the corruption of the existing federal government. However, it is interesting to note that those states joining with Texas in its law suit are more or less the same states that formed the old Confederate nation with a few other states which were part of Lincoln’s Union. Of course, the existing regime will falsely accuse those states of being “racists” or some other false accusation for the purposes of propaganda. But this is nothing more than an outright lie perpetrated by the lying liberal left.

In the absence of separate regimes, the only other possibility better than continuing down the path of hypocritical liberal corruption is to allow what happened in Chile back a few decades ago, ie, a military junta taking over government control. But there is no guarantee of that working out favorably either.